US Elections (& Politics) :)

  • Like
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: SJGUSMC21, David L and wrapter
False flag incoming, or an invasion or bombing. Trump needs a distraction
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: wrapter and johnfitz
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: SJGUSMC21, David L, johnfitz and 2 others
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: David L, Parley, wrapter and 2 others
and the Loser in Chief loses another one:

By COLLIN BINKLEY and MICHAEL CASEY
Updated 5:39 PM EDT, September 3, 2025

BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Boston on Wednesday ordered the reversal of cuts of more than $2.6 billion in federal funding for Harvard University, delivering a significant victory to the Ivy League school in its battle with the Trump administration.

U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled the cuts amounted to illegal retaliation for Harvard’s rejection of White House demands for changes to its governance and policies.

The government had tied the freezes at Harvard to delays in dealing with antisemitism on its campus, but the judge said the federally funded research had little connection to antisemitism. “A review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that Defendants used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities,” Burroughs wrote.


The ruling reverses a series of funding freezes that later became outright cuts as the Trump administration escalated its fight with the nation’s wealthiest university. The administration also has sought to prevent the school from hosting foreign students and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status in a clash watched widely across higher education.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz and Parley
From a random article:

The dump of over 33,000 pages — many of which were heavily redacted

In other words, the files weren't dumped, released, or whatever. Just as honest as no tax on social security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz and Sybertiger
tigerwillow1 said:
From a random article:

The dump of over 33,000 pages — many of which were heavily redacted

In other words, the files weren't dumped, released, or whatever. Just as honest as no tax on social security.
Click to expand...

Not only that, 97% as widely reported by members of Congress, were already public. Not much new

And many that were released were redacted MORE than the same documents that were already public!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnfitz, wrapter and Sybertiger
Delusional or Con?

If you take the Administration’s own word for it they’ll take in $300Billion in a year in tariffs
(Forget for a moment that YOU will be paying for much of it in higher prices)

Our annual income tax revenue is close to $5TRILLION with almost $3TRILLION of that personal income tax.

So the tariffs, which aren’t sustainable, would account for % 10 of what’s needed to replace income tax with tariffs.

And to make it worse, we SPEND $7 TRILLION or $2Trillion more than we take in already. That is deficit spending.

So, go home and try this with your own household income and check book for say 1 month and let me know how it goes

*Oh and guess who pays the tariffs ultimately?

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz, wrapter and bigredfish
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: JNDATHP, Parley, johnfitz and 1 other person
I know that there are a lot of Federal Judges that just really need a good old ass whooping!

1756939338191.png
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Parley, mbuster, bigredfish and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom