Review-SD4A425DB-HNY 1/2.8" CMOS 4MP 25x Starlight Auto-tracking MiniPTZ

I own one of these. But be warned, it is pretty loud when PTZ functions are working. There is an alternative model, that is much quieter, and uses undetectable (to the human eye) IR.


And, your are right, no real activity from Dahua on cameras in this category. I really can't see a reason why Dahua hasn't made available this size/type of PTZ with a 1/1.8 sensor. That would be a killer camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
It’s noticeably loud? Do you have an example you can share?

It isn't. But like everything, it is relative.

Do a search in this thread on "noise" and you will see what others have said about it.

It sounds a bit like R2D2 and in the middle of the night with no other sound, someone may slightly hear it.

But middle of the day I don't hear it.
 
Ok thanks for the info.

Is there any other noticeable difference between the 2 models besides the quieter motor?
 
Ok thanks for the info.

Is there any other noticeable difference between the 2 models besides the quieter motor?
The 'quieter' camera uses different wavelength IR at night. So no red LED's are visible by a human on this camera. The downside is, if you use supplemental IR or have cameras in the same area, their IR won't be seen by the 'quieter' camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flynreelow
The 'quieter' camera uses different wavelength IR at night. So no red LED's are visible by a human on this camera. The downside is, if you use supplemental IR or have cameras in the same area, their IR won't be seen by the 'quieter' camera.
What wavelength is the SD4A425DB-HNY-R? It looks like it just has a dark tint applied to it to make it "invisible" so I'm curious if it really is a different wavelength at all?
 
What wavelength is the SD4A425DB-HNY-R? It looks like it just has a dark tint applied to it to make it "invisible" so I'm curious if it really is a different wavelength at all?
It says 'invisible' for IR on the camera specs. That would be 940nm versus 850nm normally used on almost all security/surveillance cameras. So it truely does have more than just a smoked cover as to detect 940nm IR you would need a different filter also.
 
I think "invisible IR' is a marketing term not a technical one.
if it truly was 940nm it would say so in the specs I would think
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TuckNTruck
I think "invisible IR' is marketing term not a technical one.
if it truly was 940nm it would say so in the specs I would think
You could be right, on this. But the specs for both cameras show an IR distance of 100m vs 50m for the invisible. According to AI that's about the max distance for 940nm IR. Who the fuck knows for sure. Even the official spec sheet from Dahua only says invisible for IR, with a max distance of 50m. We all know how accurate a Dahua spec sheet can be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish