Arjun
IPCT Contributor
Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
Study links Covid injections to increased cancer risk, including breast and prostate
Breaking news from around the world.
www.disclose.tv
The two times, many years ago, I said ok I will try the Flu shot, I got the Flu, Whatha? or symptoms as I was told. One of those times I was out of work for two weeks. Both shots I was perfectly healthy, not sick when taking them, just doing a preventive. Was a bit of peer pressure, listening to others, Oh you need the Flu Shot.
The Shingles shot was on my list, I was waiting for the suggested age to get it, then came the Plandemic. Oh hell No now...no way am I going to be their guinea pig...their experiment, I would rather deal with the pain of shingles, which I have doubts the shot even prevents, I have met one person say they went through the shots and still got shingles.
I have had a Pneumonia shot, got talked into it about 2 decades ago. Only took it that one time.
Talk about regiment of shots, our daughter had my wife and I go to a clinic to get the whooping cough shot, well it was 3 shots in one, This was when her son was born, 10 years ago. New parents, scared about everything. Well we felt we better do it not to cause problems or not being able to be around out grandson,. even though I was not happy in being forced to do it. She made the appointment, prepaid. Talk about Peer-Pressure again
Family Peer-Pressure, lol
Hmmm did not know Oz was Muslim, he seemed more Jewish, lol
bigredfish
Known around here
Last edited:
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Not a single fucking thing will come of this.
This is TV drama for the weak minded
This is TV drama for the weak minded
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
8% absolute reduction. Hahahaha I will Pass...
John Rocks, love how he throws in a short few word opinion at the end of him reading these review paragraphs...
Wow, really? More pain, fatigue, headaches, myalgia (muscle pain) with mRNA vax jab compared to standard...
Plus I like his Pen
Last edited:
This looks like one of many places medical costs could be lowered, but it's not possible politically. It's a pretty clear track record of money being funneled to big pharma: (1) Invent a problem, (2) Make a drug to treat it, (3) Make insurance cover the drug, guaranteeing demand in spite of high price. I fact checked a few of the numbers and they passed. I'll note that the numbers for cholesterol are specifically for LDL.
Even when the condition is real, in most cases it can be successfully treated with changes in diet and activity. The lazy Americans prefer pills, and the political-pharma complex is happy to oblige, side effects be damned.
While doing the fact check I ran across a study that shows a strong correlation between lower cholesterol and increased dementia. I've read elsewhere that the brain needs cholesterol. With the cholesterol-lowering pills are we trading one disease for another, giving big pharma an opportunity to increase healthcare costs even more with yet another new treatment?
Even when the condition is real, in most cases it can be successfully treated with changes in diet and activity. The lazy Americans prefer pills, and the political-pharma complex is happy to oblige, side effects be damned.
While doing the fact check I ran across a study that shows a strong correlation between lower cholesterol and increased dementia. I've read elsewhere that the brain needs cholesterol. With the cholesterol-lowering pills are we trading one disease for another, giving big pharma an opportunity to increase healthcare costs even more with yet another new treatment?
Last edited:
bigredfish
Known around here
I have no informed opinion on the childhood vaccine schedule. Posting for information only.
That said, I have seen evidence that some vaccines (measles comes to mind) where the “epidemic” declined dramatically far before the introduction of the vaccine. I tend to think many of them are garbage but profitable
That said, I have seen evidence that some vaccines (measles comes to mind) where the “epidemic” declined dramatically far before the introduction of the vaccine. I tend to think many of them are garbage but profitable
Last edited:
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
I took this from a comment in the X post you posted:
1988-1993: LDL Moderate risk:<160 mg/dL
1993-2001: LDL Moderate risk:<130 mg/dL
2001-2004: Optimal LDL <100 mg/dL
2004 (enters, Statins)-2013 Optional/Reasonable goal of <70 mg/dL
So was it in 1993 the LDL #s went from 160 to 130?
My statins started after my mild heart attack in 2000, so I have seem the 130 to 100 and now I am told I need to be below 70 due to my risk. Who do you know that is not on Statins has those numbers? Especially someone in their 60s
I also saw an article referencing that study you mentioned saying the same thing, our brain needs cholesterol. What gets me is many people with any history of heart disease is on Statins, chasing those numbers.
Each time they move the Goal post they gain millions of new paying customers. What a Racket...
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish (Professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London and one of the world's leading cancer immunologists) whether he believed the COVID vaccine was creating turbo cancers. He said yes, and that after reviewing over 400 publications on the subject the mechanisms are so numerous it's surprising there aren't more cases than we're already seeing.
He walked me through several of them. The vaccine suppresses T-cell response and switches the antibody system into a tolerant state, essentially converting the body into a condition similar to transplant readiness, where it won't reject a foreign organ and won't reject a cancer. It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. The Pfizer vaccine contains SV40, a known oncogene. It interferes with dozens of metabolic and signaling pathways that, when overstimulated, drive cancer and don't switch off.
The mechanism that concerns him most is the vaccine's ability to bind and silence tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA. If someone already carries a natural mutation in one of those genes, their cancer arrives 20 or 30 years earlier than it otherwise would have. Interfere with more than two or three of these pathways simultaneously and you pull it forward even further, and when the cancer does arrive, the brakes are gone.
In nearly 40 years he said he's never seen anything like the presentations he's seeing now.
He said we should ban all mRNA vaccines, because they aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies, and giving them to children can interfere with their genome for the rest of their lives. He called allowing these products to go into young people, when we knew none of them were at risk of dying, criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century.
He walked me through several of them. The vaccine suppresses T-cell response and switches the antibody system into a tolerant state, essentially converting the body into a condition similar to transplant readiness, where it won't reject a foreign organ and won't reject a cancer. It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. The Pfizer vaccine contains SV40, a known oncogene. It interferes with dozens of metabolic and signaling pathways that, when overstimulated, drive cancer and don't switch off.
The mechanism that concerns him most is the vaccine's ability to bind and silence tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA. If someone already carries a natural mutation in one of those genes, their cancer arrives 20 or 30 years earlier than it otherwise would have. Interfere with more than two or three of these pathways simultaneously and you pull it forward even further, and when the cancer does arrive, the brakes are gone.
In nearly 40 years he said he's never seen anything like the presentations he's seeing now.
He said we should ban all mRNA vaccines, because they aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies, and giving them to children can interfere with their genome for the rest of their lives. He called allowing these products to go into young people, when we knew none of them were at risk of dying, criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century.
