Is the regime in Iran soon to be toast?

Europe/NATO didn’t invade the Middle East.

The US did. And did so with Israel without asking anyone’s opinion

Now Trump is whining because nobody will bail him out if his clusterfuck

I don’t blame them. I wouldn’t want to have my kids die for him either.

If my neighbor goes on a binge and kills someone, I’m not likely to post his bail


1. Start war. Do not tell allies.
2. Blow stuff up.
3. Demand regime change.
4. Blow up more stuff.
5. Demand unconditional surrender.
6. Get angry when enemy fights back.
7. Make threats.
8. Back down. Repeat.
9. Demand allies finish war.
10. Walk away.
 
Last edited:
It's not only that the "allies" are unwilling to actively help themselves but they are blocking our ability to more efficiently do the work that helps them. Do nothing but get out of our effing way.

 
Europe/NATO didn’t invade the Middle East.

The US did. And did so with Israel without asking anyone’s opinion

Now Trump is whining because nobody will bail him out if his clusterfuck

I don’t blame them. I wouldn’t want to have my kids die for him either.

If my neighbor goes on a binge and kills someone, I’m not likely to post his bail
How do their kids die by allowing us to fly over their territory?
 



Jeffery Sachs: “This is a stupid man. This is not a man making detailed, sophisticated calculations.

From everything I know—and I don’t know him personally, but I know a lot of people who do know him personally, and I know many who interact with him—this is an old man: impetuous, impulsive, not knowledgeable, easily swayed, unable to pay attention to briefings, and unable to study a problem.

So in weighing things, I don’t believe we are actually seeing a rational actor making difficult, complex calculations. I think we are seeing an impulsive old man who is way out of his depth, surrounded by the least competent group that I have ever seen in American politics.

The President of the United States makes a statement that is completely false and demonstrably so within moments. What does one make of that?

It’s not sophisticated lying. It’s not deception. It’s not Machiavellian politics. It is making a statement that is disproved almost immediately.

To my mind, that by itself is a pathology that should be analyzed directly.



What does it mean?

Well, the easiest interpretation is that he’s an inveterate liar—and nobody doubts that. But there’s another interpretation: that he is delusional, that at this stage he is confabulating.

When I listen to sophisticated psychiatrists and psychologists talk about Trump’s mental state, they say that he is mentally unstable, suffers from what is called the “dark triad” personality—psychopathy, extreme narcissism, chronic and impulsive lying—and no small amount of paranoia.

Some of them also say—and I find this quite credible—that there is evidence this man is experiencing dementia on top of these lifelong traits.

He’s an old man, and he often cannot finish sentences coherently. Sometimes he cannot even finish words coherently. According to psychologists, that is a sign of frontotemporal dementia.

I think this is not unimportant from a geopolitical perspective, because we tend to normalize everything. We assume he is making calculations. We ask what his next move is.

I don’t think that’s the right approach.

More importantly, we may be witnessing a breakdown of any kind of rational process in the most powerful country in the world. That is the far more dangerous and likely reality right now—that this does not make sense, that this is not savvy calculation, that this is not a stable situation.

This is an extremely dangerous situation: a small group flailing around, completely out of its depth.

And when I add Mr. Netanyahu—whom I regard as the world’s greatest war criminal at large today—who has instigated wars across his region, again in my view driven by malignant and delusional ideas, then I think the situation becomes even more fraught.

In other words, maybe I’m wrong—and often I am—but I think there is a strong personal element to this crisis right now, which would suggest a different kind of approach.

What I am suggesting every day is that the Prime Minister of India, the President of Russia, and the President of China speak directly to Mr. Trump and explain: this is not right, this is not working, this has to stop.

Rather than seeing this as a great chessboard or battlefield of great powers, this may be a delusional environment in which the central figure, Mr. Trump, needs to be helped to stop the disaster that the United States has caused.”
 
How do their kids die by allowing us to fly over their territory?

Spain, Turkey ? .. I recall 2 which I have seen refuse overflights .. if true, that's only some of Nato ..
( oh, I see now I can add Italy not wanting US planes to land .. )

Also I thought Trump wanted out of Nato ?
 
Last edited:



Jeffery Sachs: “This is a stupid man. This is not a man making detailed, sophisticated calculations.

From everything I know—and I don’t know him personally, but I know a lot of people who do know him personally, and I know many who interact with him—this is an old man: impetuous, impulsive, not knowledgeable, easily swayed, unable to pay attention to briefings, and unable to study a problem.

So in weighing things, I don’t believe we are actually seeing a rational actor making difficult, complex calculations. I think we are seeing an impulsive old man who is way out of his depth, surrounded by the least competent group that I have ever seen in American politics.

The President of the United States makes a statement that is completely false and demonstrably so within moments. What does one make of that?

It’s not sophisticated lying. It’s not deception. It’s not Machiavellian politics. It is making a statement that is disproved almost immediately.

To my mind, that by itself is a pathology that should be analyzed directly.



What does it mean?

Well, the easiest interpretation is that he’s an inveterate liar—and nobody doubts that. But there’s another interpretation: that he is delusional, that at this stage he is confabulating.

When I listen to sophisticated psychiatrists and psychologists talk about Trump’s mental state, they say that he is mentally unstable, suffers from what is called the “dark triad” personality—psychopathy, extreme narcissism, chronic and impulsive lying—and no small amount of paranoia.

Some of them also say—and I find this quite credible—that there is evidence this man is experiencing dementia on top of these lifelong traits.

He’s an old man, and he often cannot finish sentences coherently. Sometimes he cannot even finish words coherently. According to psychologists, that is a sign of frontotemporal dementia.

I think this is not unimportant from a geopolitical perspective, because we tend to normalize everything. We assume he is making calculations. We ask what his next move is.

I don’t think that’s the right approach.

More importantly, we may be witnessing a breakdown of any kind of rational process in the most powerful country in the world. That is the far more dangerous and likely reality right now—that this does not make sense, that this is not savvy calculation, that this is not a stable situation.

This is an extremely dangerous situation: a small group flailing around, completely out of its depth.

And when I add Mr. Netanyahu—whom I regard as the world’s greatest war criminal at large today—who has instigated wars across his region, again in my view driven by malignant and delusional ideas, then I think the situation becomes even more fraught.

In other words, maybe I’m wrong—and often I am—but I think there is a strong personal element to this crisis right now, which would suggest a different kind of approach.

What I am suggesting every day is that the Prime Minister of India, the President of Russia, and the President of China speak directly to Mr. Trump and explain: this is not right, this is not working, this has to stop.

Rather than seeing this as a great chessboard or battlefield of great powers, this may be a delusional environment in which the central figure, Mr. Trump, needs to be helped to stop the disaster that the United States has caused.”


USA started this, now it needs to finish this

USA unfortunately has to finish this so that Iran is weaker than the start, this is critical for the world and middle east that Iran not get nukes

Is the USA finishes this and leaves the Iranian Regime able to control the Persian Gulf .. we are in a world of hurt

Israel imho should control the West Bank settlers and not allow them to abuse their West Bank co-habitants
 
Isolationism
iso·la·tion·ism
[ˌʌɪsəˈleɪʃənɪz(ə)m]

Noun:
: a policy of national isolation by abstention from alliances and other international political and economic relations



Isolationism .. isn't this originally a part of what some wanted in the USA ??

Dump the alliances
 
yup .. USA has to finish what it started or it will get worse


1774968241565.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz
Good - Seek Reparations, good luck Iran, your adversaries will change the narrative :lmao:

Turkey likes this idea, they can make boatloads from Russian Oil leaving the Black Sea ..

Denmark and Sweden should also like this idea as they can toll keep the Baltic ..

Singapore also ..
 
Europe/NATO didn’t invade the Middle East.

The US did. And did so with Israel without asking anyone’s opinion

Now Trump is whining because nobody will bail him out if his clusterfuck
yup .. USA has to finish what it started or it will get worse
Israelis got what they wanted, US got stuck with the bill.


So, Netanyahu wants to continue but Trump wants to stop...

Trump's whining because nobody will bail him out if his clusterfuck and he has to finish what he started...


Screenshot 2026-03-11 212001.png
 
USA to Blockade the Strait ?

Bolton claims this is Europe's War .. when I look at the Oil flow out of the Persian Gulf, seems like it is more Asia's war than Europe

Iran is Europe's war - Trump wants to declare victory and get out | John Bolton
The Sun

Mar 31, 2026 WASHINGTON
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton to President Donald Trump weighs in on Operation Epic Fury. As a man who sat in the situation room with Trump, Bolton knows how the President thinks and gives his analysis of what Donald Trump's options are to end the Iran War.

The Sun brings you breaking news and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From the ongoing war in Ukraine to conflicts in the Middle East and US and UK politics, we post updates as they happen. Expect the latest on major global events, pressing political debates, celebrity updates and exclusive royal family content, along with in-depth investigations and expert commentary. Get comprehensive coverage of Donald Trump's Presidency, Vladimir Putin's actions, and the unfolding drama of the British Royal Family.



In this video, former National Security Adviser John Bolton provides his analysis on the ongoing conflict with Iran and the status of the current administration's regime change objective. Bolton discusses the following key points:

  • Status of Regime Change: Despite significant damage to Iran's military, nuclear, and missile programs, Bolton argues that the regime remains intact. He describes the Iranian government as a "deep state" that has maintained its hardline ideology for 47 years, even as leadership faces internal fragmentation (0:02-1:49).
  • The Strait of Hormuz: The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has made the geopolitical threat a reality rather than a hypothetical scenario. Bolton emphasizes that this creates a "mortal threat" to Gulf Arab states and necessitates a clear strategy for regional stability (2:40-4:39).
  • Strategic Criticisms: Bolton expresses concerns regarding the administration's execution of the war. He highlights that the President failed to properly prepare the American public, Congress, and international allies for the necessity and scope of the conflict (5:43-7:02, 10:06-11:08).
  • The Path Forward: Looking ahead, Bolton suggests that a potential transition could involve the conventional military stepping in to restore order, rather than an immediate democratic outcome. He urges for more support for opposition groups and emphasizes that staying the course is critical, as the regime is reportedly showing signs of cracking (4:40-5:36, 8:17-9:54).