World War III

Is some group behind instigating the riots in the EU?

 
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
Hmmm

I wonder if it’s going to take as long for some to get what’s really happening as it did for those same folks to catch on to our Dear Leader?

Gosh I hope not

===========

Look at those two hooded figures throwing grenades. They must be some red delinquents. Or worse, Muslims who want to put an end to our way of life. Now look at how the police escort them. Because they are also police. The far left, according to Macron...

 
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and wrapter
Reports Trump planning to meet with Putin and Xi to carve up Ukraine for Putin ..



How Trump has made the world a more dangerous place





This video from LBC discusses reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed a trilateral meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to discuss the conflict in Ukraine (0:00-0:42). The proposed summit, potentially occurring on the sidelines of the upcoming APEC summit in Shenzhen, has raised significant concerns about the prospect of Ukraine being sidelined in negotiations over its own territory (0:24-0:59, 2:42-3:02).

Key Discussion Points:

  • Trump's Stance: President Trump has openly criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, suggesting he is a barrier to peace and that a different negotiator may be needed to settle the war (1:16-2:04). Trump has also recently made moves—such as specific energy deals and sanctions adjustments—that critics argue have emboldened Russia (0:48-1:05).
  • Expert Analysis: Former British Defence Minister Tobias Ellwood joins the program to condemn the potential summit, describing it as dangerous for global stability (4:03-4:46). He argues that such an approach undermines the rules-based international order and suggests that the United States is becoming increasingly detached from its traditional alliances (4:48-5:21).
  • Future Implications: Ellwood warns that any forced peace deal would only allow Russia to pause, rearm, and eventually resume aggression. He asserts that European leaders, including the British Prime Minister, must stop "cowtowing" to American policy and start speaking out more forcefully against this new U.S. trajectory (5:22-6:06, 8:37-10:25).
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: johnfitz and bigredfish
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and bigredfish
Do you keep enough cash on hand ?

 
  • Wow
Reactions: wrapter and johnfitz
Only retarded people believe this

 
  • Sad
  • Haha
Reactions: wrapter and johnfitz
Its ALL psyop


What the actual fuck is this world coming to?

!Putin is mediating peace talks between Iran and the United States;

Trump is mediating peace talks between Russia and Ukraine;

Iran is mediating peace talks between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis;

Pakistan is mediating peace talks between Iran and the United States;

The United States is mediating peace talks between Pakistan and India.

And they're all calling on both sides to exercise restraint!!!

:rofl::winktongue:


 
  • Haha
Reactions: mat200, wrapter and johnfitz
wrapter said:
It's a open secret
Click to expand...


ummm .. there are volunteers in both Russian and Ukrainian Armies who are NOT Russian nor Ukrainian.

Ukraine even had some US Marines who joined up.

Russia had a large number of North Koreans, some Chinese even
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and bigredfish
Putin's Proposal: A Trump-Xi-Putin Summit?



This video, presented by Ryan McBeth, discusses a reported proposal by Vladimir Putin for a high-level summit between President Trump, Xi Jinping, and himself to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine (0:00 - 0:06).

Key takeaways from the discussion:

  • The Proposed Format: The summit would exclude Ukraine and its leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which McBeth argues deserves significant scrutiny (0:24 - 0:30).
  • Status of the Proposal: As of mid-October, there is no official agreement on the summit, no confirmed agenda, and reports suggest China may not have even been informed of the plan (0:37 - 0:51).
  • Strategic Analysis: McBeth analyzes why this summit might be occurring, noting that it serves as a powerful photo opportunity for Putin to project international status and influence, regardless of whether a peace deal is actually reached (0:53 - 1:04, 6:01 - 6:44).
  • Critique of the Process: The creator emphasizes that any legitimate negotiation must include Ukraine, as they are the party directly affected and have the most at stake (3:37 - 3:51, 5:32 - 5:53).
  • International Context: The video touches upon the strategic partnership between Russia and China, noting that China benefits from cheap oil and data on NATO equipment performance, which may complicate their role as an impartial mediator (7:35 - 8:22).
McBeth concludes by explaining the risks of such a format, specifically that it could be used to pressure Ukraine into unfavorable terms, and reiterates that a durable peace requires enforceable guarantees and meaningful participation from all involved parties (10:47 - 11:13).
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz and bigredfish
mat200 said:
ummm .. there are volunteers in both Russian and Ukrainian Armies who are NOT Russian nor Ukrainian.

Ukraine even had some US Marines who joined up.

Russia had a large number of North Koreans, some Chinese even
Click to expand...
The volunteers are mercenaries of which there are plenty on either side from different countries. Plenty of Americans fighting on Russian side too.

North Korean troops on the other hand are offcial request by Russia and with Kim Jong fat blessings with official ceremony this is due to their defense pact. They where used inside Russia when Ukraine invaded mainland Russia Kursk region which was a failure by Ukraine. Because of which Russia said they will need a buffer zone through out its border sharing Ukraine.

The British Storm Shadow missiles and other stuff needs British specialists. A lot of Nato personal are involved in strategy and decision makings on the battlefield in official capacity. Thats the difference between them and the average mercenary. When ever there is a high value attack on Russian SAM installation or some USV attacks on port, you always find a Nato drone or RC135 flying just outside Russian air defense identification zone. So there is deep Nato involvement in Ukraine. Nato aircrafts are also used for relay for drones and USV long before starshield.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: johnfitz and bigredfish
wrapter said:
The volunteers are mercenaries of which there are plenty on either side from different countries. Plenty of Americans fighting on Russian side too.

North Korean troops on the other hand are offcial request by Russia and with Kim Jong fat blessings with official ceremony this is due to their defense pact. They where used inside Russia when Ukraine invaded mainland Russia Kursk region which was a failure by Ukraine. Because of which Russia said they will need a buffer zone through out its border sharing Ukraine.

The British Storm Shadow missiles and other stuff needs British specialists. A lot of Nato personal are involved in strategy and decision makings on the battlefield in official capacity. Thats the difference between them and the average mercenary. When ever there is a high value attack on Russian SAM installation or some USV attacks on port, you always find a Nato drone or RC135 flying just outside Russian air defense identification zone. So there is deep Nato involvement in Ukraine. Nato aircrafts are also used for relay for drones and USV long before starshield.
Click to expand...

well .. the UK, USA, and Russia all DID pledge to support Ukrainian Security Assurances, that is: Commitments to refrain from the threat or use of force against Ukraine’s territorial integrity and political independence.

SO 100% OK for UK to step in there.

Not OK for Russia to invade ..

Ukraine should have kept their Nukes

Iran now gonna double down and try to get their own Nukes, as I suspect Poland will also
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: wrapter and johnfitz
It requires the US only to respect Ukraine's borders/sovereignty, refrain from force or economic coercion against it, seek UNSC action solely for nuclear aggression, and consult. It imposes no duty to arm, fund, or militarily defend Ukraine.Ukraine is not a formal US treaty ally or Major Non-NATO Ally
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom