IMO bad... there's no way to overlook the deficit spending... unless you believe that the tax cuts will create that much growth... last time:
US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
IMO bad... there's no way to overlook the deficit spending... unless you believe that the tax cuts will create that much growth... last time:
Oceanslider
Known around here
‘Have You Considered Changing?’: Florida Teens Asked To Consider Becoming Gay In Class Assignment
Florida high school students were drilled for being straight, asked to consider being gay, and told that straight people are to blame for overpopulation, according to course materials obtained by The Daily Wire.During a course for high school children in Miami-Dade County, students were assigned...
Sybertiger
Known around here
The only overpopulation problem we have is an overpopulation of dumbarses such as the person who came up with this class assignment.View attachment 222182
‘Have You Considered Changing?’: Florida Teens Asked To Consider Becoming Gay In Class Assignment
Florida high school students were drilled for being straight, asked to consider being gay, and told that straight people are to blame for overpopulation, according to course materials obtained by The Daily Wire.During a course for high school children in Miami-Dade County, students were assigned...www.dailywire.com
bigredfish
Known around here
Musk taking it to them. Amazing LOL!
Oceanslider
Known around here
View attachment 222182
‘Have You Considered Changing?’: Florida Teens Asked To Consider Becoming Gay In Class Assignment
Florida high school students were drilled for being straight, asked to consider being gay, and told that straight people are to blame for overpopulation, according to course materials obtained by The Daily Wire.During a course for high school children in Miami-Dade County, students were assigned...
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Kill (The) Bill: Musk Goes Ballistic Against GOP Tax And Spending Package
Kill (The) Bill: Musk Goes Ballistic Against GOP Tax And Spending Package | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
bigredfish
Known around here
Trust me Bro....
An "HR issue" could mean dismissal, Right? Tell me I'm right! Ah F***, who am I kidding.
Video evidence? I thought they said all cams were down?
bigredfish
Known around here
Another day, another blatant bullshit lie from the leader of the Republican House.
They’re laughing at you
They’re laughing at you
bigredfish
Known around here
And. . . let's rollback some EPA regs while we are at iy
By SETH BORENSTEIN, M.K. WILDEMAN, MELINA WALLING, JOSHUA A. BICKEL and MATTHEW DALY
Updated 12:49 PM EDT, June 5, 2025
When the head of the Environmental Protection Agency announced a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations, he said it would put a “dagger through the heart of climate-change religion” and introduce a “Golden Age” for the American economy.
What Lee Zeldin didn’t mention: how ending the rules could have devastating consequences to human health.
The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency’s own prior assessments as well as a wide range of other research.
It’s by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated; they can’t be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification.
But experts say the numbers are conservative and that even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth’s warming to deadlier levels.
“More people will die,” said Cory Zigler, a professor of biostatistics at Brown University who has studied air pollution deaths from coal-fired power plants. “More of this type of pollution that we know kills people will be in the air.”
By SETH BORENSTEIN, M.K. WILDEMAN, MELINA WALLING, JOSHUA A. BICKEL and MATTHEW DALY
Updated 12:49 PM EDT, June 5, 2025
When the head of the Environmental Protection Agency announced a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations, he said it would put a “dagger through the heart of climate-change religion” and introduce a “Golden Age” for the American economy.
What Lee Zeldin didn’t mention: how ending the rules could have devastating consequences to human health.
The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency’s own prior assessments as well as a wide range of other research.
It’s by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated; they can’t be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification.
But experts say the numbers are conservative and that even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth’s warming to deadlier levels.
“More people will die,” said Cory Zigler, a professor of biostatistics at Brown University who has studied air pollution deaths from coal-fired power plants. “More of this type of pollution that we know kills people will be in the air.”
Once a liar. . . . .
Trump claimed that six months to a year ago, military recruitment numbers “were record low” and attributed a recent uptick to “spirit” and a renewed love for the U.S.
But recruitment numbers for all military branches have been on the rise for the last few years, according to Defense Department data.
Military enlistment was 12.5% higher in fiscal year 2024, which ran from Oct. 1, 2023, to Sept. 30, 2024, than in fiscal year 2023. There were 225,000 new recruits in the former and 200,000 in the latter, said Katie Helland, who oversees recruitment policies and programs as the Defense Department’s director of Military Accession Policy, at a media roundtable in October.
Trump repeats false claim that before his presidency no one wanted to join the military
By MELISSA GOLDINTrump claimed that six months to a year ago, military recruitment numbers “were record low” and attributed a recent uptick to “spirit” and a renewed love for the U.S.
But recruitment numbers for all military branches have been on the rise for the last few years, according to Defense Department data.
Military enlistment was 12.5% higher in fiscal year 2024, which ran from Oct. 1, 2023, to Sept. 30, 2024, than in fiscal year 2023. There were 225,000 new recruits in the former and 200,000 in the latter, said Katie Helland, who oversees recruitment policies and programs as the Defense Department’s director of Military Accession Policy, at a media roundtable in October.
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
bigredfish
Known around here
The fight between Elon and Trump has gone Nuclear.
I'm talking off the charts knock down drag out.
Its ugly and just wow. Elon basically pushed thin skinned Trump too hard and the gloves are off. In public.
Trump is literally making shit up, Elon is calling him a liar, and who knows where it will go
I'm talking off the charts knock down drag out.
Its ugly and just wow. Elon basically pushed thin skinned Trump too hard and the gloves are off. In public.
Trump is literally making shit up, Elon is calling him a liar, and who knows where it will go
bigredfish
Known around here
Never before in history has this kind of public argument happened at this level in front of the entire world, in real time.