I agree, that was a stupid statement from Dinesh. What he helped me understand and get back to thinking right, is Trump is a Salesman. Salespeople will say whatever needed to close the sale. I still believe Trump is working for the best interest of this nation. Yes, even with the war we are in. Most people only look at the Now, they ignore the future, look at what has happened to Europe. The Islam invasion. Israel and us are the last strong hold, IMO, to this invasion. Most people are ignorant to what Islam actually is, what is in their Koran.
Sharia, Islam, Muslim .. pay attention to your blind spots
- Thread starter mat200
- Start date
I agree, that was a stupid statement from Dinesh. What he helped me understand and get back to thinking right, is Trump is a Salesman. Salespeople will say whatever needed to close the sale. I still believe Trump is working for the best interest of this nation. Yes, even with the war we are in. Most people only look at the Now, they ignore the future, look at what has happened to Europe. The Islam invasion. Israel and us are the last strong hold, IMO, to this invasion. Most people are ignorant to what Islam actually is, what is in their Koran.
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
How Overton High supports Muslim students during Ramadan - Nashville Banner
Muslim students at John Overton High School balance fasting, schoolwork, and faith during Ramadan. They say the sacrifices promote discipline and peace.
nashvillebanner.com
Last edited:
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Brilliant...just learned more about Oil Wells...longer negotiations only hurt Iran...
USA, USA, USA!!! Love it...
To add to the above, looks like Iran folded...
USA, USA, USA!!! Love it...
To add to the above, looks like Iran folded...
Well that did not last long...really shows who we are dealing with...
Oceanslider
Known around here
Islamic lunatic's. Would it seem odd to anyone that as long as they are in control that they would be willing to go down burning?
Last edited:
They would just try to claim Martyrism, which they always get that wrong.
Killing/Murdering someone in the name of their God is NOT Martyrism. Suicide Bombing is NOT. Crashing an airplane full of civilians is NOT. All this does is makes you a Murderer...NOT a Martyr.
Dying for, being killed for your faith IS Martyrism. Charlie Kirk was a true Martyr.
Oceanslider
Known around here
All for 70 nine-year-old virgins waiting for them in heaven. And these 70 are said to be newly (re)flowered each day.
- Jan 17, 2017
- 18,787
- 31,421
Academic WARNED Not to Research Extreme ISLAMISM – Dr. Daniel Allingdon
The Daily Heretic
Apr 19, 2026 #DanielAllington #AcademicFreedom #IslamismDebate
Subscribe to The Daily Heretic for fearless conversations about truth, power, and the ideas institutions are increasingly afraid to confront.
/ @hereticsclips
What happens when an academic is quietly warned not to pursue a line of research — not because it’s wrong, but because it’s politically dangerous? In this episode of Heretics, I’m joined by Dr Daniel Allington, a scholar and commentator who explains why researching extreme Islamism and antisemitism has become one of the most sensitive — and professionally risky — areas in modern academia.
Dr Allington lays out how certain topics have effectively become off-limits within universities, even when the data is robust and the methodology sound. He explains that antisemitism does not always appear where institutions expect or prefer it to appear, and why research that challenges comfortable assumptions can trigger resistance, reputational attacks, or quiet pressure to stop altogether.
This conversation isn’t about attacking religion or communities. It’s about academic freedom — and what happens when ideological boundaries replace open inquiry. Dr Allington describes how research into political Islam, extremist networks, and antisemitic attitudes is often treated as inherently suspect, regardless of evidence, while other forms of extremism receive far less institutional pushback.
We explore the mechanics of academic gatekeeping: how funding decisions, peer review, internal complaints, and informal warnings shape what scholars feel safe researching. Dr Allington explains why many academics self-censor long before publishing anything controversial — and why those who don’t risk stalled careers, public smears, or professional isolation.
The discussion widens to the cultural implications. What does it mean for society when entire areas of inquiry are effectively closed? How does this distort public understanding of extremism, prejudice, and radicalisation? And why do institutions often prioritise reputational safety over intellectual honesty?
Crucially, this episode avoids sensationalism. It doesn’t make sweeping claims or offer easy villains. Instead, it shows how institutional incentives quietly shape knowledge itself — and why uncomfortable research is often the first casualty when politics enters the academy.
You don’t have to agree with every conclusion Dr Allington draws to find this conversation essential. Its value lies in understanding how research becomes taboo, why some evidence is treated as dangerous, and what that means for universities that claim to value truth above all else.
If you care about free inquiry, evidence-led debate, and the cost of challenging dominant narratives, this episode offers a rare, inside look at the pressures shaping modern scholarship.
The Daily Heretic
Apr 19, 2026 #DanielAllington #AcademicFreedom #IslamismDebate
Subscribe to The Daily Heretic for fearless conversations about truth, power, and the ideas institutions are increasingly afraid to confront.
/ @hereticsclips
What happens when an academic is quietly warned not to pursue a line of research — not because it’s wrong, but because it’s politically dangerous? In this episode of Heretics, I’m joined by Dr Daniel Allington, a scholar and commentator who explains why researching extreme Islamism and antisemitism has become one of the most sensitive — and professionally risky — areas in modern academia.
Dr Allington lays out how certain topics have effectively become off-limits within universities, even when the data is robust and the methodology sound. He explains that antisemitism does not always appear where institutions expect or prefer it to appear, and why research that challenges comfortable assumptions can trigger resistance, reputational attacks, or quiet pressure to stop altogether.
This conversation isn’t about attacking religion or communities. It’s about academic freedom — and what happens when ideological boundaries replace open inquiry. Dr Allington describes how research into political Islam, extremist networks, and antisemitic attitudes is often treated as inherently suspect, regardless of evidence, while other forms of extremism receive far less institutional pushback.
We explore the mechanics of academic gatekeeping: how funding decisions, peer review, internal complaints, and informal warnings shape what scholars feel safe researching. Dr Allington explains why many academics self-censor long before publishing anything controversial — and why those who don’t risk stalled careers, public smears, or professional isolation.
The discussion widens to the cultural implications. What does it mean for society when entire areas of inquiry are effectively closed? How does this distort public understanding of extremism, prejudice, and radicalisation? And why do institutions often prioritise reputational safety over intellectual honesty?
Crucially, this episode avoids sensationalism. It doesn’t make sweeping claims or offer easy villains. Instead, it shows how institutional incentives quietly shape knowledge itself — and why uncomfortable research is often the first casualty when politics enters the academy.
You don’t have to agree with every conclusion Dr Allington draws to find this conversation essential. Its value lies in understanding how research becomes taboo, why some evidence is treated as dangerous, and what that means for universities that claim to value truth above all else.
If you care about free inquiry, evidence-led debate, and the cost of challenging dominant narratives, this episode offers a rare, inside look at the pressures shaping modern scholarship.
Oceanslider
Known around here
WOW, this was the best short version summary I have ever heard of the history of Islam. He summed up several points nicely, if you know about the Koran, it is a mixture of several religions all thrown together. IMO, it is important to see the angel (Muhamad claimed it was Gabriel) or the spirits that came to Muhamad as the Devil then you can see why he was instructed to kill and enslave Jews, Infidels.
I also love how he defines the different meanings of the word Peace (4:33 minute mark). Muslim's definition of Peace is when the whole world summits to the will of their Allah, so World Islam, of course this is done by conquering the world where the definition of Peace to a Christian is to bring the Love of our Lord Jesus to the lost (The Great Commission), but not in/by force like Islam does.
The other point (7:15 minute mark) he made that many ignore or don't understand is, Muslims will kill their own (Muslims), when they are seen as not following the will of their Allah. We have just witnessed it recently in Iran, they still showcase these killings in public.
Last edited:
Oceanslider
Known around here
But it's 50 years of men and women both, from birth, being taught jihad. The only real cure would be for them to accept Jesus as Lord. That's really the cure.
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
- Jan 17, 2017
- 18,787
- 31,421