Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
My son periodically takes Ivermectin to clean out his system/body. Kills unwanted parasites...
bigredfish
Known around here
If you go back 4-5 years in this thread you'll see I called out Ralph Baric and UNC Chapel Hill as the birthplace and father of Covid
Ralph gets his funding from NIH/Fauci/DARPA
Ralph gets his funding from NIH/Fauci/DARPA
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Hey I am just sharing this, not sure if it matters but when I post say from YT or other platforms I remove the identifiers, as I call them, and just post the link. Again not sure if it matters or not but just sharing...
When I clicked on your post this is what shows in my browser. For X it is just the number behind /status/, for YouTube it is the characters behind /watch?v= with both normally to the question mark. I noticed the same with other platforms like Fakebook and Instacram...
So I would copy/paste just the highlighted:
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Hmmm. Using Brave, which seems to be like Chrome.
When I hover my cursor over the X this is the URL it shows...maybe it is a chrome/brave thing...
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Ralph Baric Just Blew Up the Official COVID Origins Narrative
and other true stories
Dr. Robert W. Malone
Jul 23, 2026
Executive Summary
Over the past day, we have worked our way through the thousands of pages of documents Senator Rand Paul recently released in his COVID-19 Reading Room, including the transcribed interview with Dr. Ralph Baric released today. Using AI to analyze this enormous collection of congressional testimony, emails, and Slack messages, we uncovered a series of remarkable revelations that fundamentally change our understanding of how the origins of COVID-19 were discussed behind closed doors.
For more than five years, the American public was told that the science was settled. The laboratory-origin hypothesis was dismissed as implausible, The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 became the definitive scientific narrative, and those who questioned it were censored, ridiculed, and marginalized.
The newly released documents in Senator Rand Paul’s COVID-19 Reading Room tell a very different story.
Congressional testimony from Dr. Ralph Baric and thousands of pages of private Slack messages reveal that the scientists closest to the evidence privately debated laboratory scenarios, acknowledged uncertainty, discussed gain-of-function research, and questioned many of the very assumptions that were presented to the public as settled science.
Baric himself confirms that DARPA’s proposed coronavirus experiments were gain-of-function research, acknowledges conducting gain-of-function unpublished experiments that undermined a central argument of Proximal Origin, and describes years of coronavirus work involving many of the same investigators and institutions that later became central to the origins debate.
Meanwhile, the Slack discussions show that the paper’s authors continued privately exploring laboratory-related mechanisms both before and long after their paper had become the foundation for government messaging and censorship.
These documents prove that the public was never given the full scientific debate. They expose serious questions about scientific transparency, government involvement, funding disclosures, oversight of gain-of-function research, and the extraordinary effort to present uncertainty as certainty during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history.
What makes this all so important is that this information is now in the congressional record. It can be acted upon.
1. DARPA explicitly solicited gain-of-function research
Baric testified that the DARPA PREEMPT program required gain-of-function experiments to answer the scientific question it posed.
His exact words:
“That’s a gain-of-function experiment. There’s no other way to think about it.”
This undercuts years of semantic arguments that the proposed work somehow wasn’t GOF.
more:
www.malone.news
and other true stories
Dr. Robert W. Malone
Jul 23, 2026
Executive Summary
Over the past day, we have worked our way through the thousands of pages of documents Senator Rand Paul recently released in his COVID-19 Reading Room, including the transcribed interview with Dr. Ralph Baric released today. Using AI to analyze this enormous collection of congressional testimony, emails, and Slack messages, we uncovered a series of remarkable revelations that fundamentally change our understanding of how the origins of COVID-19 were discussed behind closed doors.
For more than five years, the American public was told that the science was settled. The laboratory-origin hypothesis was dismissed as implausible, The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 became the definitive scientific narrative, and those who questioned it were censored, ridiculed, and marginalized.
The newly released documents in Senator Rand Paul’s COVID-19 Reading Room tell a very different story.
Congressional testimony from Dr. Ralph Baric and thousands of pages of private Slack messages reveal that the scientists closest to the evidence privately debated laboratory scenarios, acknowledged uncertainty, discussed gain-of-function research, and questioned many of the very assumptions that were presented to the public as settled science.
Baric himself confirms that DARPA’s proposed coronavirus experiments were gain-of-function research, acknowledges conducting gain-of-function unpublished experiments that undermined a central argument of Proximal Origin, and describes years of coronavirus work involving many of the same investigators and institutions that later became central to the origins debate.
Meanwhile, the Slack discussions show that the paper’s authors continued privately exploring laboratory-related mechanisms both before and long after their paper had become the foundation for government messaging and censorship.
These documents prove that the public was never given the full scientific debate. They expose serious questions about scientific transparency, government involvement, funding disclosures, oversight of gain-of-function research, and the extraordinary effort to present uncertainty as certainty during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history.
What makes this all so important is that this information is now in the congressional record. It can be acted upon.
1. DARPA explicitly solicited gain-of-function research
Baric testified that the DARPA PREEMPT program required gain-of-function experiments to answer the scientific question it posed.
His exact words:
“That’s a gain-of-function experiment. There’s no other way to think about it.”
This undercuts years of semantic arguments that the proposed work somehow wasn’t GOF.
more:
Ralph Baric Just Blew Up the Official COVID Origins Narrative
and other true stories
www.malone.news