Package Thief flips my house off

IReallyLikePizza2

Known around here
May 14, 2019
2,655
6,112
Houston
I think this highlights how I need to adjust some cameras, and get the auto-track working a little better on the PTZ

The box was empty, sat outside for 3 days! He realizes its empty and flips me off









 
That is hilarious, but dude, as you pointed out, you need to work on those camera settings. All color is useless if it looks like Reolink ghosting LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chokolinho
I'm honestly generally okay with the ghosting and whatever on the Front Path camera, as thats more of an overview camera

I need to get the front door camera better first! Thats the priority for now I think
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
I think this highlights how I need to adjust some cameras, and get the auto-track working a little better on the PTZ

The box was empty, sat outside for 3 days! He realizes its empty and flips me off
His mask might hide his face but his mode of transport is unique!
5 Am?
we had a 2Am to 4 Am bike guy car door checker that I sometimes I'd see in action when I worked an hour later on Saturday nites and got home like 2 am. when i lived in St. Paul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Techie007L
I'm tempted to get up early and see if I can see him do the same somewhere, and snag his bike :rofl:
 
@IReallyLikePizza2 The cheap Color4M-TL cameras I have installed so far consistently do a better job than this with even less light. That ghosting and blurring of moving objects shown here is terrible! I would not be extolling that camera's virtues any more than a Reolink camera if this is what it regularly did. While I wish it did even better, it is definitely an incremental improvement over the 5442-LED cameras, with light sensitivity similar to the big Color4K-T/X cameras.

edit: "Pitch dark" is not how I would describe that scene—I see street lights and significant lighting from your house. Try "can't see anything with the naked eye until the camera's white LED comes on" for actual "pitch dark". With the subject in your front yard, the Color4M-TL would've been basking in light and virtually free of motion blur with the lighting present in that scene. And at the street, it subject would've appeared well lit, sharper, and with a bit less motion blur than recorded here. And you wouldn't have been getting blur trails everywhere that moth was flying—darker and there would've been noise trails, but with that amount of light it would've maintained a clear image.
 
Last edited:
The problem is the lack of light, there is not much light here at all, its almost pitch dark at the street
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
I may swap those front cams for S3's, they are regular T5442T-ZE's

I can also add more light
 
If you had active deterrence camera with a strobe or a speaker activated by an IVS rule, do you think it would make a difference?

If you were allowed to have a fence around your property everything was much simpler.