Correct, but on the other side of the coin this is what a few representative gold stocks are doing today:
I've noticed in the past that when the stocks illogically go down, the bullion price follows them down within days. (I've also noticed that when I make a financial declaration it usually does the opposite).
I'd opine opposite that. Smaller geometry means more speed and less power going up as heat, both pretty important as mankind wipes himself out with technology.
Yes, that is true. But how many applications need it? Sure, for cutting-edge processors (GPUs), but given their cost, they aren't very widespread. Any other application uses older (sometimes much older) processes, especially analog and RF/MMW.
"Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted, when you add the previous Biden revision of -577,000 to the current revision of -911,000 the Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) had overreported Biden’s job growth by almost 1.5 million jobs."
Correct, but on the other side of the coin this is what a few representative gold stocks are doing today: View attachment 227727
I've noticed in the past that when the stocks illogically go down, the bullion price follows them down within days. (I've also noticed that when I make a financial declaration it usually does the opposite).
Stocks are decoupled from reality and have been for quite a long time. 50X multiples on companies barely making it LOL!
I dont play the stocks at all, and I think miner's are a sucker bet
I'm only watching physical (and the #GLD ETF that follows it) which has more than doubled for me since Sept '23.
Sold just under 1/2 my initial buy and am playing with their money now.
This may very well be true but that's not my purpose for this post. With this and many other examples from the last week or two, it's looking to me like a coordinated media campaign to make it "necessary" to lower interest rates.
No, they wouldn’t do that! That’s not playing fair.
Besides, we don’t need it. Trump said the other day that people (who I’m not clear on) were going to be investing $17Trillion in the US in the next few months.
As our annual spend is about $7 Trillion, that means these “people” are going to give us 2 1/2 years worth of Federal budget because they like him or something, um not clear on that but don’t sweat the details
No, they wouldn’t do that! That’s not playing fair.
Besides, we don’t need it. Trump said the other day that people (who I’m not clear on) were going to be investing $17Trillion in the US in the next few months.
As our annual spend is about $7 Trillion, that means these “people” are going to give us 2 1/2 years worth of Federal budget because they like him or something, um not clear on that but don’t sweat the details
No, they wouldn’t do that! That’s not playing fair.
Besides, we don’t need it. Trump said the other day that people (who I’m not clear on) were going to be investing $17Trillion in the US in the next few months.
As our annual spend is about $7 Trillion, that means these “people” are going to give us 2 1/2 years worth of Federal budget because they like him or something, um not clear on that but don’t sweat the details
