Money & Economics

(Rate Cuts Good - Jobs/Employment Overrated)

----------------------

Opinion: The Fed will be forced into deep rate cuts in 2026 — boosting gold and breaking the dollar​

The next Fed chair will grapple with a deteriorating U.S. job market and slower economic growth



Slowing growth, weakening employment and contained inflation already argue for easier central bank policy.
The U.S. Federal Reserve will likely cut rates more this year than both central bankers and financial markets expect.

This is largely because the U.S. labor market continues to deteriorate. While job openings appeared to stabilize in October, quits have fallen, pointing to ongoing loosening. Wage growth tells the same story.

The November employment report reinforced this view. Job growth was positive, but gains were concentrated in education and health services. More cyclical sectors showed minimal growth. Crucially, the unemployment rate rose to 4.6% from 4.4%, while the U-6 underemployment rate increased to 8.7% from 8.0%.

These data validate the Fed’s recent “insurance” cuts. They do not seal the case for a January move, but they materially lower the bar for additional easing. Job growth remains modest and subject to large revisions, while private-sector momentum is weak.

Importantly, the data also help resolve the key macro debate of recent months: Whether the job slowdown is demand-driven or supply-driven. Rising unemployment, cooling wages, falling quits and weakening sentiment among workers and firms all point toward weaker labor demand rather than structural labor shortages.

While the labor market has not collapsed, it is effectively at a standstill and shows no signs of acceleration. With the Fed’s own unemployment projection at 4.5% for 2025, any further deceleration would justify more easing than markets currently price.

Read: U.S. on verge of unemployment surge that forces Fed to slash rates, Wall Street veteran says

Rumblings and dissent​

At its December 2025 meeting, the Fed cut interest rates by 25 basis points (0.25 percentage points), bringing its policy range to 3.5%-3.75%. The decision once again revealed divisions within the committee. Fed governor Stephen Miran favored a larger 50-basis-point cut, while Presidents Jeffrey Schmid and Austan Goolsbee voted for no change — with Schmid dissenting for a second consecutive meeting.

The central bank’s “dot plot” reinforced those divisions. In addition to the formal dissents, four participants registered so-called “soft” dissents, indicating that, while they may not have been voters, they believed policy should have remained unchanged. Looking ahead, the dots point to just one additional rate cut in 2026.

That projection rests on two assumptions embedded in the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections: Stronger growth and lower unemployment next year. While possible, this is not the most likely outcome. Before answering why, it is worth assessing where monetary policy stands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat200
meanwhile .. the next attack on the tx payer / citizen is coming ..



1767637628860.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerwillow1
Here’s one freshly tee’d up! by our government overlords.

See how that works?
Government picks winners, you bet on that pick and make money.

Too bad for those who don’t get picked.
That old fashioned free market stuff takes too long


 
  • Wow
Reactions: mat200
^^^ What's with all the Market post, thought it has nothing to do with the Economy, haha...just sayin' ;)

I post a YTD and have to put on a Dunce Hat...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: gwminor48
Is anybody interested in measly thousand dollar tax things? Most of the posts here are about billions and trillions.

A new tax provision starting with 2026 returns for charitable contributions has the potential for even extra savings for social security recipients. It's the $1,000 ($2,000 for joint filers) charitable deduction that can be taken on top of the standard deduction. Just like with the crap political reporting, the internet if full of contradictory "facts" from financial experts. The differing opinions I've seen are:

1. If the deduction does or does not lower AGI.
2. If it's indexed for inflation or not.

My best take at the moment is that it lowers AGI and is not indexed, but I won't be sure until IRS publishes the specifics. If it does lower AGI, it will also reduce the amount of social security that's taxed. That means that in addition to the contribution itself lowering the tax burden, it will additionally reduce the social security tax burden. A rare bonus! (Yes, I do know that there's no tax on social security, a different subject).

The actual IRS code text doesn't indicate if the new deduction does or does not reduce AGI:

(p)Special rule for taxpayers who do not elect to itemize deductions
In the case of any taxable year, if the individual does not elect to itemize deductions for such taxable year, the deduction under this section shall be equal to the deduction, not in excess of 1,000 ($2,000 in the case of a joint return), which would be determined under this section if the only charitable contributions taken into account in determining such deduction were contributions made in cash during such taxable year (determined without regard to subsections (b)(1)(G)(ii), (b)(1)(I), and (d)(1)) to an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A) and not—
(1)to an organization described in section 509(a)(3), or
(2)for the establishment of a new, or maintenance of an existing, donor advised fund (as defined in section 4966(d)(2)).


This section was first used in 2020 for a CARES act provision, and IRS did implement it as an adjustment to AGI, so there's precedent that the $1,000/$2,000 deduction will lower AGI. Then again, IRS inconsistency wouldn't shock me.
 
Is anybody interested in measly thousand dollar tax things? Most of the posts here are about billions and trillions.

A new tax provision starting with 2026 returns for charitable contributions has the potential for even extra savings for social security recipients. It's the $1,000 ($2,000 for joint filers) charitable deduction that can be taken on top of the standard deduction. Just like with the crap political reporting, the internet if full of contradictory "facts" from financial experts. The differing opinions I've seen are:

1. If the deduction does or does not lower AGI.
2. If it's indexed for inflation or not.

My best take at the moment is that it lowers AGI and is not indexed, but I won't be sure until IRS publishes the specifics. If it does lower AGI, it will also reduce the amount of social security that's taxed. That means that in addition to the contribution itself lowering the tax burden, it will additionally reduce the social security tax burden. A rare bonus! (Yes, I do know that there's no tax on social security, a different subject).

The actual IRS code text doesn't indicate if the new deduction does or does not reduce AGI:

(p)Special rule for taxpayers who do not elect to itemize deductions
In the case of any taxable year, if the individual does not elect to itemize deductions for such taxable year, the deduction under this section shall be equal to the deduction, not in excess of 1,000 ($2,000 in the case of a joint return), which would be determined under this section if the only charitable contributions taken into account in determining such deduction were contributions made in cash during such taxable year (determined without regard to subsections (b)(1)(G)(ii), (b)(1)(I), and (d)(1)) to an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A) and not—
(1)to an organization described in section 509(a)(3), or
(2)for the establishment of a new, or maintenance of an existing, donor advised fund (as defined in section 4966(d)(2)).


This section was first used in 2020 for a CARES act provision, and IRS did implement it as an adjustment to AGI, so there's precedent that the $1,000/$2,000 deduction will lower AGI. Then again, IRS inconsistency wouldn't shock me.
I am interested, a thousand dollars to us is like a million to others. These last 5 years of groceries going through the roof, which has blown the Inflation figures all out of whack, IMO, add over priced housing/property. It is hard to really get a good finger on things. I know in the housing market, when we were selling, the concern was getting a proper appraisal from a Lender/Bank for the Buyer. What our Agent told us, depending on the bank, they have had to adjust greatly since the housing price boom, so it could go either way.

My point is, it is hard to properly value housing like with Inflation. The Plandemic screwed everything up there.

Maybe I should not give my prediction, who am I anyway, lol, but I don't foresee housing dropping, nor groceries down to anywhere near Pre-Plandemic. I think we are stuck with this mess. We may see some drop, 10-20%, but really kind of doubt it...and if so, prices will quickly jump back to where they are presently. Not happy with where we are but definitely don't want anymore increase anytime soon...

Only increase we have experienced is Restaurant prices going up, they held out long enough hoping food prices would come back down. Now they are passing these increases to their patrons. But as I have mentioned before, we still have some restaurants, like Mexican, that have not increased their prices, plus we still have good lunch deals around too.

We pray everyone has a good 2026, 2025 was good for us, still have not dipped into our Retirement savings for monthly living expenses except for big project stuff...which we are almost done with our list of Wants :), lol
 
I have a feeling those holding dollars are about to get fucked without lubrication

That said, how does an average Joe go about buying and holding their own bitcoin?
Oh yeah it is coming...how much will cash be worth when converted to digital...the question of the Century....how will they value it?

I here people tell me it is already digital, but not Bitcoin digital. We will see how CBDC plays out. Are they going to throw it all into one big pot?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat200
Oh yeah it is coming...how much will cash be worth when converted to digital...the question of the Century....how will they value it?

I here people tell me it is already digital, but not Bitcoin digital. We will see how CBDC plays out. Are they going to throw it all into one big pot?

I wouldnt wait. Its being fast tracked by Banks and the Fed literally today
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat200 and David L