tigerwillow1
Known around here
I think this simple-looking comparison has a lot of complex interactions behind it, to the point of not knowing what it means, if it has any meaning at all. I don't have any answers, just a lot of questions. I can't find in the article how the gold is valued. I'm assuming in dollars, which makes it it kind of an incestuous comparison. What if both the gold and treasuries were valued against some other currency, or some other commodity, would the result be very different? Gold has doubled against the dollar in approximately 2 years, so even if the banks hadn't bought any gold, the comparison would have been wildly different just because time passed. If the gold price does down 10% against the dollar, the stated result will be false.Central Banks Now Hold More Gold Than US Treasuries
Central Banks Now Hold More Gold Than US Treasuries | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Does this stat just confirm that the dollar is tanking, which we already knew? Does it mean something else? It's kind of hard to compare ounces to dollars, akin to asking if 3 decibels weighs more than 50 watts.