House narrowly DEFEATS War Powers Resolution that would have directed Trump to END 'hostilities' in Iran
Final vote count: 213-214
Final vote count: 213-214
House narrowly DEFEATS War Powers Resolution that would have directed Trump to END 'hostilities' in Iran
Final vote count: 213-214
And I wonder how many of those "representatives" voted the will of the people that they supposedly represent?House narrowly DEFEATS War Powers Resolution that would have directed Trump to END 'hostilities' in Iran
Victor Davis Hanson: Anti-MAGA Right Knows Iran Campaign Is No Forever War
The Daily Signal
Apr 16, 2026 Victor Davis Hanson: In a Few Words
Operation Epic Fury was never the pretext for a larger, endless war, and the so-called anti-MAGA right—Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, or Marjorie Taylor Greene—should know better than to label it as such, argues Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In a Few Words.”
The whole subtext of the Iran campaign is this: While regime change is not the primary agenda, America’s weakening of the regime may spur people to rise up and overthrow the government.
In this video, Victor Davis Hanson discusses the phenomenon of prominent figures on the right, such as Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, distancing themselves from Donald Trump. He argues that this shift is largely driven by disagreements over the current U.S. military strategy regarding Iran.
Key takeaways from the discussion:
Hanson concludes by cautioning that if these critics sit out the midterms or oppose Trump, they are de facto supporting an alternative political agenda that is fundamentally opposed to the values they have previously championed (9:34-10:11).
- Critique of the "Anti-MAGA Right": Hanson asserts that these former supporters are mislabeling the current military campaign against Iran as an "endless war." He argues that, unlike previous conflicts in Iraq or Afghanistan, this is an asymmetrical, air-based operation aimed at preventing nuclear proliferation without significant ground involvement (2:34-3:33).
- The Nature of the Iran Conflict: Hanson explains that the strikes are a targeted effort to dismantle Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities, military command structures, and theocratic leadership. He suggests the campaign's subtext is to weaken the regime, potentially encouraging internal uprisings (5:48-6:07).
- Disagreement vs. Betrayal: Hanson addresses Trump's rhetoric, including the controversial statement about destroying Iran's civilization, by pointing to Trump's actual record of avoiding dual-use civilian targets compared to previous administrations (4:10-5:47).
- The Broader Agenda: Hanson warns that by breaking with Trump over a single issue, these critics risk undermining the entire MAGA agenda, which he claims has been successful on major issues like border control, energy production, ending DEI initiatives, and addressing transgender policy in sports (6:15-8:25).
Victor Davis Hanson: Anti-MAGA Right Knows Iran Campaign Is No Forever War
The Daily Signal
Apr 16, 2026 Victor Davis Hanson: In a Few Words
Operation Epic Fury was never the pretext for a larger, endless war, and the so-called anti-MAGA right—Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, or Marjorie Taylor Greene—should know better than to label it as such, argues Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In a Few Words.”
The whole subtext of the Iran campaign is this: While regime change is not the primary agenda, America’s weakening of the regime may spur people to rise up and overthrow the government.
In this video, Victor Davis Hanson discusses the phenomenon of prominent figures on the right, such as Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, distancing themselves from Donald Trump. He argues that this shift is largely driven by disagreements over the current U.S. military strategy regarding Iran.
Key takeaways from the discussion:
Hanson concludes by cautioning that if these critics sit out the midterms or oppose Trump, they are de facto supporting an alternative political agenda that is fundamentally opposed to the values they have previously championed (9:34-10:11).
- Critique of the "Anti-MAGA Right": Hanson asserts that these former supporters are mislabeling the current military campaign against Iran as an "endless war." He argues that, unlike previous conflicts in Iraq or Afghanistan, this is an asymmetrical, air-based operation aimed at preventing nuclear proliferation without significant ground involvement (2:34-3:33).
- The Nature of the Iran Conflict: Hanson explains that the strikes are a targeted effort to dismantle Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities, military command structures, and theocratic leadership. He suggests the campaign's subtext is to weaken the regime, potentially encouraging internal uprisings (5:48-6:07).
- Disagreement vs. Betrayal: Hanson addresses Trump's rhetoric, including the controversial statement about destroying Iran's civilization, by pointing to Trump's actual record of avoiding dual-use civilian targets compared to previous administrations (4:10-5:47).
- The Broader Agenda: Hanson warns that by breaking with Trump over a single issue, these critics risk undermining the entire MAGA agenda, which he claims has been successful on major issues like border control, energy production, ending DEI initiatives, and addressing transgender policy in sports (6:15-8:25).
Of COURSE they are. Its an easy play.My prediction :
Iranian Mullahs and IRGC going to try to wait Trump out as long as they can
Possible forever peace negotiations ?