good wifi camera

jumpman

n3wb
Jan 28, 2026
2
0
USA
Good morning,

I currently use reolink because it is impossible for me to use rj45 cables. But Despite a more than honorable wifi network, These cameras are constantly disconnecting. Are there more reliable cameras by chance?
 
Good morning,

I currently use reolink because it is impossible for me to use rj45 cables. But Despite a more than honorable wifi network, These cameras are constantly disconnecting. Are there more reliable cameras by chance?

Welcome @jumpman

WiFi tends to be very problematic for CCTV / security cameras

In general members have reported numerous reliability issues with WiFi cameras

Do you own the house / building ?
Or are you renting ?
 
Wifi and cameras do not go together.

There are always ways if you don't want to run an ethernet cable.

You need power anyway, so go with a powerline adapter to run the date over your electric lines or use a nano-station.

Maybe you are fine now one day with wifi cams, but one day something will happen. A new device, neighbors microwave, etc.

Cameras connected to Wifi routers (whether wifi or not) are problematic for surveillance cameras because they are always streaming and passing data. And the data demands go up with motion and then you lose signal. A lost packet and it has to resend. It can bring the whole network down if trying to send cameras through a wifi router. At the very least it can slow down your entire system.

Unlike Netflix and other streaming services that buffer a movie, these cameras do not buffer up part of the video, so drop outs are frequent, especially once you start adding distance. You would be amazed how much streaming services buffer - don't believe me, start watching something and unplug your router and watch how much longer you can watch NetFlix before it freezes - mine goes 45 seconds. Now do the same with a camera connected to a router and it is fairly instantaneous (within the latency of the stream itself)...

The same issue applies even with the hard-wired cameras trying to send all this non-buffer video stream through a router. Most consumer grade wifi routers are not designed to pass the constant video stream data of cameras, and since they do not buffer, you get these issues. The consumer routers are just not designed for this kind of traffic, even a GB speed router.

So the more cameras you add, the bigger the potential for issues.

Many people unfortunately think wifi cameras are the answer and they are not. People will say what about Ring and Nest - well that is another whole host of issues that we will not discuss here LOL, but they are not streaming 24/7, only when you pull up the app. And then we see all the people come here after that system failed them because their wifi couldn't keep up when the perp came by. For streaming 24/7 to something like an NVR or Blue Iris, forget about it if you want reliability.


This was a great test that SouthernYankee tried and posted about it here:

I did a WIFI test a while back with multiple 2MP cameras each camera was set to VBR, 15 FPS, 15 Iframe, 3072kbs, h.264. Using a WIFI analyzer I selected the least busy channel (1,6,11) on the 2.4 GHZ band and set up a separate access point. With 3 cameras in direct line of sight of the AP about 25 feet away I was able to maintain a reasonable stable network with only intermittent signal drops from the cameras. Added a 4th camera and the network became totally unstable. Also add a lot of motion to the 3 cameras caused some more network instability. More data more instability.
The cameras are nearly continuously transmitting. So any lost packet causes a retry, which cause more traffic, which causes more lost packets.
WIFI does not have a flow control, or a token to transmit. So your devices transmit any time they want, more devices more collisions.
As a side note, it is very easy to jam a WIFI network. WIFI is fine for watching the bird feed but not for home surveillance and security.
The problem is like standing in a room, with multiple people talking to you at the same time about different subjects. You need to answer each person or they repeat the question.

Test do not guess.

For a 802.11G 2.4 GHZ WIFI network the Theoretical Speed is 54Mbps (6.7MBs) real word speed is nearer to 10-29Mbps (1.25-3.6 MBs) for a single channel

And TonyR recommends this (which is the preferred way IF you want to do wifi)

The only way I'd have wireless cams is the way I have them now: a dedicated 802.11n, 2.4GHz Access Point for 3 cams, nothing else uses that AP. Its assigned channel is at the max separation from another 2.4GHz channel in the house. There is no other house near me for about 300 yards and we're separated by dense foliage and trees.

Those 3 cams are indoor, non-critical pet cams (Amcrest IP2M-841's) streaming to Blue Iris and are adequately reliable for their jobs. They take their turns losing signal/reconnecting usually about every 12 hours or so for about 20 seconds which I would not tolerate for an outdoor surveillance cam pointed at my house and/or property.

But for me, this works in my situation: dedicated AP, non-critical application and periodic, short-term video loss.... if any one of those 3 conditions can't be achieved or tolerated, then I also do not recommend using wireless cams.
 
Indoor or outdoor camera?
How do you plan to power the camera...with a wall wart (plug into wall outlet) ?
 
How well does this work? Years ago I tried something similar to get phone out to my shop and it was unreliable.

Like everything, YMMV. I have had one going for over 12 years and has been flawless. Camera never shows a drop or loss signal in BI.

Many here have had one working great, while others have had issues or not working at all. So many nuances with electric that can cause problems.

The big one I have seen is do not use a surge protector on either end.

Some say the breaker should be on the same side for the two connection points, but I have used them on separate sides, one in the main box and the other in a side panel, one thru 3 GCFI outlets without issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat200 and Keizer
Thank you all for your very informative analysis. So yes, I am aware that for nominal operation, the cable remains the mandatory option. Unfortunately it is complicated to proceed with such a network for 5 cameras, especially since one of them would be on a dependence. As for the electrical network, I am not sure of its efficiency because I had used a socket to extend the wifi, but without success. So I opted for a mesh system and the wifi is much better
 
In the experiences of members here, no wifi system, mesh and all, can do a good job with these types of cameras.

As I said, a big issue is the lack of buffering of these devices compared to anything else on the network. They can saturate and clog up the wifi real quick. Those dropped packets kill a system. That is why you see them disconnecting. A temporary solution is to set up the router on a frequent reboot schedule.

The wifi cams on the market will all suffer from what you are experiencing. And Reolink plays a lot of games to keep the bandwidth down (which results in the poor video performance with motion) and if you are experiencing it with them, then you will with them all, which has been the experiences of folks here.

If wifi cams are used, it is for noncritical stuff like pet watching.

Now you could look at something like an Arlo system that uses its own device to connect the wifi cams to, but just recognize they are not streaming 24/7, only when you pull up the app. And then we see all the people come here after that system failed them because their wifi couldn't keep up when the perp came by. For streaming 24/7 to something like an NVR or Blue Iris, forget about it if you want reliability.

We had an incident here many hears ago and my neighbor's car was ransacked and his Arlo cams completely missed the incident despite his car and the perp being within 10 feet of the camera. Many wifi cams record on motion only and motion can be missed.

But even if they could keep up, most of us have seen subpar performance of these types of cameras.

We have a thread dedicated to the wifi consumer cams - are any of these images adequate quality for your needs?

 
  • Like
Reactions: mat200