Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

...never let emotions or ethics get in the way of a stock trade...
Buying stock is not an investment in the company. Buying its stock is not an endorsement of the company. When you buy stock, you are not giving the money to the manufacturer. It is just a bet (wager) on the potential of the stock to rise. Betting on roulette is not an endorsement in the manufacturer of the roulette wheel. Betting on a poker hand is not an endorsement of the manufacturer of the cards.
 
Exactly.

But I have to remind myself of that from time to time !
 
Our country is so completely and deeply corrupt that it's just a matter of time before it all comes tumbling down.

It will be ugly, people lives will be destroyed..

 
Last edited:
You just thought it was bad before…

 
WOW, 1 in 12?

1787652226322.png
 
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
@NicHulscher

Within 72 hours, a sequence of devastating scientific blows to the entire mRNA “vaccine” platform will begin.
The first study lands this week. The second follows next week.
Turbo cancer will no longer be dismissible as “theoretical.”
Stay tuned.


 
 
Ex-FDA Commissioner Privately Told CIA That Up to 25% of Americans Had Already Achieved
Natural Immunity Through Exposure to COVID by May 2020, Unclassified Document Reveals

by Jim Hᴏft Sep. 2, 2026 12:20 pm


Newly released documents are raising explosive questions about what pharmaceutical insiders and America’s intelligence community knew about COVID-19 immunity during the earliest months of the pandemic and why Americans were hearing a dramatically different story in public.

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) released records detailing a May 7, 2020, CIA briefing involving Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA commissioner who had joined Pfizer’s board of directors the previous year. Paul announced on X: “I released documents showing Pfizer and the CIA privately acknowledged high population immunity as early as May 2020, while the public heard a different story. Americans deserve the truth.” He pointed to reporting at Brownstone Institute on a newly unclassified CIA meeting summary buried in the latest tranche of records Paul entered into the congressional record.

The date on the briefing is May 7, 2020. That is two months after the country was shut down. Churches closed. Small businesses crushed. Kids locked out of school. Fauci and Deborah Birx still talking as if this was a rare, novel threat that required indefinite emergency rule until a pharmaceutical product arrived.

Inside the CIA, they were already talking seroprevalence. Seroprevalence is the percentage or proportion of people in a specific population who have antibodies against a specific disease or infectious agent in their blood serum. According to the agency’s own write-up of the meeting, CIA Chief Operating Officer Andy Makridis sat down with Dr. Scott Gottlieb. Gottlieb was not some outside critic. He was a former FDA commissioner, a sitting Pfizer board member, and a member of the CIA’s External Advisory Board. One man. Three hats. Vaccine company. Spy agency. Former regulator.

The CIA summary records Gottlieb’s assessment on herd immunity:



 

In case you're all wondering why Robert F Kennedy Jr fired the entire panel entire panel that advises the CDC on vaccine recommendations — and the entire cabal industry tried to remove him — this is why.A vaccine recommendation was unanimously approved despite safety concerns being brought forward by ONE committee member about signs of potential heart attacks before they even rolled them out to the public.They shut the concerns down immediately and refused to listen.The committee voted to support the vaccine recommendation while acknowledging they have NO DATA on using this vaccine simultaneously with other vaccines, because they get massive kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies for allowing poison to be distributed to the people."Post market research" means your children are the test subjects.

 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
 
Dr. Peter Rost: " We didn't discover drugs, we discovered markets. If a drug cured asthma in 3 days, we would eliminate it.
Chronic diseases are where the money is. Cures are bad for business."

Microsoft's CoPilot confirms the above quote thus:“'If a drug cured asthma in 3 days, we'd kill it. Chronic disease is where the money is. Cures are bad for business'...

While some debate the literal interpretation of this claim, it underscores the broader concern that financial incentives in the pharmaceutical industry may not always align with optimal patient outcomes. Overall, Rost’s perspective provides insight into the ethical and economic dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry, illustrating why whistleblowers and regulatory oversight are considered crucial for accountability and patient safety.

CoPilot adds:"Peter Rost, former Pfizer executive, claimed that pharmaceutical companies often prioritize market creation over curing diseases, asserting that chronic conditions are more profitable than cures.Peter Rost is an American former drug marketing executive who worked at Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies for many years, gaining insider knowledge of industry practices He became widely known for his whistleblower activities, particularly exposing off-label marketing of drugs like Genotropin and other unethical practices within Pfizer and Pharmacia

Rost has publicly stated that during his tenure, the focus was often on discovering markets rather than drugs themselves, and that cures for diseases could be seen as financially disadvantageous because chronic conditions generate ongoing revenue.

In his book, The Whistleblower: Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman, Rost details how he observed and challenged practices such as off-label marketing, channel stuffing, and prioritizing profit over patient outcomes.He emphasizes that the pharmaceutical business model can create incentives that favor long-term treatment over outright cures, raising ethical concerns about patient care and transparency."
 
yes sir
 
I say skip Trials, we already have enough evidence...
 
  • Like
Reactions: VorlonFrog