Do you all agree with this statement regarding different focal lengths?

I've been saying for years they should make an IP cam with a very high resolution sensor and good lens like you would find in a $300-$1000 handheld camera. Or a DSLR like a professional photographer would use. Doesn't matter if they can't do the sensor justice will full motion video. Because they can use a lower res sensor and fixed wide lens for video and for triggering the big boy to take zoomed in very crisp photos. Imagine if every AI confirmed trigger came with 32 megapixel jpegs that look like you had someone standing on your porch with a zoom lens. They could even throw in a high powered flash (light) so it can take sharp pictures of moving things at night. I am sure it would be expensive as hell because of the unusual engineering involved and relatively small market who can afford it. But there are people willing to pay crazy amounts for high end cams. There would be a market for this. Maybe they are already making these and I just don't know about them because the price is too high.

As you know, they already made it in the Sony SNC-VB770IP camera with a 35mm sensor as per this test by a retailer:



I'm sure BP remembers this and that a member used to have one on here. The trouble was it was over $6,500 from memory for body alone & then required a 35mm lens, housing with heater, bracket etc running the bill up to around $10K by the time it was installed. It didn't seem to last very long in the line up from what I remember, probably due to the cost & consequential low sales?

That said, there have always been alternatives, subject to Sony being willing to do a reasonably priced deal for outdated equipment to cctv manufacturers eg. the Sony A7iii sensor and processor, legendary at night and Sony is now onto the A7 V, so it's 2 generations old. Surely if Sony eg. were concerned about them finding their way into someone else's DSLR's they could physically hardware disable some features on chip not needed for CCTV such as stills capture or the most complex metering aspects eg 1,200 zones down to 200 or some thing similar etc? Surely a kit lens could be arranged for cheap, after all CCTV only needs consumer grade lenses although with a 35mm mount, it would leave it open for users to upgrade. I envisage such a camera wouldn't be cheap but I think users might pay $400-450 for such a camera and with sensor development costs paid for, surely manufacturing isn't that epensive using existing lines?



Another alternative would be a 1inch sensor as used in some action cameras or phones. Yep you're losing a lot compared to 35mm, but everything else supporting it eg lenses becomes cheaper.

DJI managed to put a Hassleblad designed 1inch sensor & lens on their Air 3S drone which now retails for $1k. That sounds a lot but you have to remember that's the whole drone plus controller plus 2nd Hasslebad lens and sensor for that money as it has 2 cameras! Strip away the costs associated with the drone, controller, a 2nd camera etc and the camera shouldn't look too expesnisve on it's own and the quality of sensor board plus Hasslebad lens looks amzing, watch this review here:

Overview starts about the camera at 39 secs and goes straight into full blown camera analysis after that point. Well worth a watch as it's amazing at 1st glance.



The problem to me seems to be the industry either doesn't appear that interested in making huge changes or maybe there's some availability / prices issues from the low light sensor manufacturers. Either way, as others have noted, the rate of change in CCTV is very slow. I always remember though what I was told in relation to hifi, put crap in, get crap out. You're always limited by your input and with cameras that's the sensor / processor package. A high qaulity lens as seen on the Air3S shows it can make a real difference. That said the ultimate limitation is always that you can't improve what isn't there in the 1st place.


I've been following the remarks from Ubiquiti users on Reddit lately:
  • One user flagged that DORI values are insignificant to the CCTV world now due to 4K sensors being featured in high-end Ubiquiti models like the G6 Pro Turret
  • One user states that Dahua cameras are by no means "professional"
  • Another user also stated that focal lengths are no longer need to be considered due to the 4K sensors with 1/1.2" sensors that perform well 24/7 and has plenty of pixels to zoom into on any part of the frame

The way companies like Apple and Samsung put multiple cameras on the rear of their phones could be the way forward with newer IP cameras in the future as @steve1225 stated with Bayer technology

Sounds like a housewives thread! I'd like to see what 4k sensor allows you to zoom right into any part of the frame because most on here have Dahua or Hik who produce arguably the best mainstream CCTV cameras, and the background pixel detail is often representative at best (compression profile?). Even a couple of x zoom and often the definition detail isn't there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bp2008
As you know, they already made it in the Sony SNC-VB770IP camera with a 35mm sensor as per this test by a retailer:



I'm sure BP remembers this and that a member used to have one on here. The trouble was it was over $6,500 from memory for body alone & then required a 35mm lens, housing with heater, bracket etc running the bill up to around $10K by the time it was installed. It didn't seem to last very long in the line up from what I remember, probably due to the cost & consequential low sales?

That said, there have always been alternatives, subject to Sony being willing to do a reasonably priced deal for outdated equipment to cctv manufacturers eg. the Sony A7iii sensor and processor, legendary at night and Sony is now onto the A7 V, so it's 2 generations old. Surely if Sony eg. were concerned about them finding their way into someone else's DSLR's they could physically hardware disable some features on chip not needed for CCTV such as stills capture or the most complex metering aspects eg 1,200 zones down to 200 or some thing similar etc? Surely a kit lens could be arranged for cheap, after all CCTV only needs consumer grade lenses although with a 35mm mount, it would leave it open for users to upgrade. I envisage such a camera wouldn't be cheap but I think users might pay $400-450 for such a camera and with sensor development costs paid for, surely manufacturing isn't that epensive using existing lines?



Another alternative would be a 1inch sensor as used in some action cameras or phones. Yep you're losing a lot compared to 35mm, but everything else supporting it eg lenses becomes cheaper.

DJI managed to put a Hassleblad designed 1inch sensor & lens on their Air 3S drone which now retails for $1k. That sounds a lot but you have to remember that's the whole drone plus controller plus 2nd Hasslebad lens and sensor for that money as it has 2 cameras! Strip away the costs associated with the drone, controller, a 2nd camera etc and the camera shouldn't look too expesnisve on it's own and the quality of sensor board plus Hasslebad lens looks amzing, watch this review here:

Overview starts about the camera at 39 secs and goes straight into full blown camera analysis after that point. Well worth a watch as it's amazing at 1st glance.



The problem to me seems to be the industry either doesn't appear that interested in making huge changes or maybe there's some availability / prices issues from the low light sensor manufacturers. Either way, as others have noted, the rate of change in CCTV is very slow. I always remember though what I was told in relation to hifi, put crap in, get crap out. You're always limited by your input and with cameras that's the sensor / processor package. A high qaulity lens as seen on the Air3S shows it can make a real difference. That said the ultimate limitation is always that you can't improve what isn't there in the 1st place.




Sounds like a housewives thread! I'd like to see what 4k sensor allows you to zoom right into any part of the frame because most on here have Dahua or Hik who produce arguably the best mainstream CCTV cameras, and the background pixel detail is often representative at best (compression profile?). Even a couple of x zoom and often the definition detail isn't there.

The Mavic series has the Hasselblad designed sensors, not the mid-tier Air 3S (Air 3S still uses a respectable sensor engineering by DJI in-house, applicable to both their Air 3S, Mini 5 Pro, and Pocket 3 Osmo series) - but either way a 1 inch sensor would be nice for IP cameras as well and would still come at a higher premium which I am sure we all would still welcome (in a good way of course)
 
The Mavic series has the Hasselblad designed sensors, not the mid-tier Air 3S (Air 3S still uses a respectable sensor engineering by DJI in-house, applicable to both their Air 3S, Mini 5 Pro, and Pocket 3 Osmo series) - but either way a 1 inch sensor would be nice for IP cameras as well and would still come at a higher premium which I am sure we all would still welcome (in a good way of course)

just must remember that those sensors and all quad bayer sensors for mobiles - are sensors which ARE NOT NIR enhanced..

so they are very bad for IR. you can do full color cam on it, but nor IR cam..

like situation with Sony Starvis 1/1.2" sensor used in Color4K (Dahua 5849). It is used only in full color cams, not IR cams, both by Dahua and HIK - because that sensor wasn't NIR enhanced..

but yes - those sensors exists.. and should be relatively more easy to procedure CCTV / NIR enhanced versions of it - for CCTV market.

but for that - must be market. someone who will pay and buy those new CCTV sensors in bigger quantities for a good price..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
just must remember that those sensors and all quad bayer sensors for mobiles - are sensors which ARE NOT NIR enhanced..

so they are very bad for IR. you can do full color cam on it, but nor IR cam..

like situation with Sony Starvis 1/1.2" sensor used in Color4K (Dahua 5849). It is used only in full color cams, not IR cams, both by Dahua and HIK - because that sensor wasn't NIR enhanced..

but yes - those sensors exists.. and should be relatively more easy to procedure CCTV / NIR enhanced versions of it - for CCTV market.

but for that - must be market. someone who will pay and buy those new CCTV sensors in bigger quantities for a good price..
I am seriously interested to see a teardown of a Ubiquiti UniFi G6 Pro Turret because that has built-in IR with 1/1.2" sensor
Anyone wants to contribute to my GoFundMePage? :p jk
 
for 99% it contains new OmniVision OS08B10... similar to normal G6, where someone here confirmed they used OmniVision sensor there..

The G6 Standard model uses a 1/1.8" sensor whereas the Pro model uses a 1/1.2" sensor (which seems to be what you linked). I wonder why Dahua could not do what Ubiquiti could (as far as a varifocal Turret model goes) - was it due to lack of interest?
 
The G6 Standard model uses a 1/1.8" sensor whereas the Pro model uses a 1/1.2" sensor (which seems to be what you linked). I wonder why Dahua could not do what Ubiquiti could (as far as a varifocal Turret model goes) - was it due to lack of interest?
I was hoping that new Dahua 7 series will use new 1/1.2" sensor from OmniVision (or Sony Starvis 2) to differentiate from 5 series..
I wrote about this 2-3 times on this forum..

But this never materialized...

answer is of course money - bigger sensors costs more, require bigger/better/pricey optics and chassis..
everything costs more..

As I wrote many times - cctv cams are low cost products - Dahua China sells them on fraction price which we see as end users..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
I was hoping that new Dahua 7 series will use new 1/1.2" sensor from OmniVision (or Sony Starvis 2) to differentiate from 5 series..
I wrote about this 2-3 times on this forum..

But this never materialized...

answer is of course money - bigger sensors costs more, require bigger/better/pricey optics and chassis..
everything costs more..

As I wrote many times - cctv cams are low cost products - Dahua China sells them on fraction price which we see as end users..
Question is, how much more would it cost? Ubiquiti is clearly overinflating prices on their end. I mean $500 for 1x Varifocal Turret is ridiculous; if Dahua can sell it for half the price, I would gladly upgrade, but seems like we are stuck in 5442 territory and future business with Dahua's partners is questionable now due to price increases starting next week. If any Dahua camera fails going forward, I might just suck it up and swap them with Ubiquti cameras one-by-one. Fortunately, I have not had any IP camera fail on me. I know Dahua can do it, but they just need to wake up.
 
Question is, how much more would it cost? Ubiquiti is clearly overinflating prices on their end. I mean $500 for 1x Varifocal Turret is ridiculous; if Dahua can sell it for half the price, I would gladly upgrade, but seems like we are stuck in 5442 territory and future business with Dahua's partners is questionable now due to price increases starting next week. If any Dahua camera fails going forward, I might just suck it up and swap them with Ubiquti cameras one-by-one. Fortunately, I have not had any IP camera fail on me. I know Dahua can do it, but they just need to wake up.

Problem with Dahua is that, they don't see Ubiquity as a competition..
They see HIK Vision as competition - so everything HIK is doing Dahua is copying and vice versa..

Also they more and more entering other industries like monitors or profesional big event LED displays or even drones (Yes they have professional big drones on Chinese market)..

Due HIK & Dahua blockage by western countries and small margins from CCTV business they will invest less & less into that business.
Also they have big problems with very old almost 20 years old code base (software - mobile/deskton apps, camera/NVR firmwares) which is very hard to develop any more...

ps. Both HIK and Dahua usually in April / May presents new products for next year. We will see where they are going. As a usual I will try to get internal presentations about next new products...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
Problem with Dahua is that, they don't see Ubiquity as a competition..
They see HIK Vision as competition - so everything HIK is doing Dahua is copying and vice versa..

Also they more and more entering other industries like monitors or profesional big event LED displays or even drones (Yes they have professional big drones on Chinese market)..

Due HIK & Dahua blockage by western countries and small margins from CCTV business they will invest less & less into that business.
Also they have big problems with very old almost 20 years old code base (software - mobile/deskton apps, camera/NVR firmwares) which is very hard to develop any more...

ps. Both HIK and Dahua usually in April / May presents new products for next year. We will see where they are going. As a usual I will try to get internal presentations about next new products...
I've learned to lower my expectations and now that prices are increasing, I could very well be moving on to something else because pricing might coincide with Ubiquiti territory. I'm likely to keep using these Dahua cameras until they fail completely. I strongly doubt that we will be seeing any significant improvement or successor to the 5442 series anytime soon. Even a 1/1.2" sensor is long overdue and by the time that releases, we might be getting extremely close to 1" inch sensors.
 
Last edited:
The G6 Standard model uses a 1/1.8" sensor whereas the Pro model uses a 1/1.2" sensor (which seems to be what you linked). I wonder why Dahua could not do what Ubiquiti could (as far as a varifocal Turret model goes) - was it due to lack of interest?
I think this is because the sensor is really bad in low/IR light conditions. Once you get your G6 Pro, you will see it yourself.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Arjun
I think this is because the sensor is really bad in low/IR light conditions. Once you get your G6 Pro, you will see it yourself.
G6 Pro utilizes a bigger sensor than the regular G6 turret and therefore should be able to do better in low / IR light conditions almost on par with the 5442 series
Then again - I won't know until I am able to afford and get one. Once I do, I will surely update you all :)
 
I responded you back on that thread - are you able to post a picture of the camera itself? The overlay looks different and its hard for me to be fully convinced that thats a G6 Pro (unless
Settings are not set correctly then thats a different story)
I replied you in that thread because it's defintely not about focal lengths anymore :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Arjun