What turned me off was the fact you could buy a new camera for the cost of one of their AI ports. I agree with your corking fee analogy. It's like a punishment for wanting to use your own cameras. Like an expensive work around. You are definitely trapped in their eco system if you go down the Unify path. I also don't buy into the "it just works" claim. What just works? Their neutered/locked down Protect OS? Yeah, it just works with your hands tied behind your back.EDIT - I actually watched the video posted above and it goes into the functionality of the AI port. The AI port certainly adds some pretty cool AI functionality that arguably is unique to the Unify system (at least at this point in time). It's probably worth the cost if this is important to you. But that being said, I still believe it is a "corking" fee to use non-Unify cameras because this is all a software based solution. There is nothing preventing Unity from doing all those AI functions for non-Unify cameras without the AI port, but I bet they realize that no one would buy their cameras if all the great AI functionality was available on non-Unify cameras out of the box. Feel free to correct me if I misunderstand how this works however.
Original Message:
I'm not really familiar with the Unify system. Why does Unify even need the optional "AI ports". I feel like it is nothing but a "corking fee" that they are charging people that want to use non-Unify cameras. Aren't they simply limiting the actual capabilities of these cameras unless you pay them to "unlock" the functionality through the use of an "AI port"? Are there any unique functions that the AI port brings to the Unify system that aren't available if someone used the those cameras with a different solution like BI with their AI models?