bigredfish
Known around here
yes thats the gun they said they found and posted 2 days agio.
I think conservatives calling out the leftist with their own hypocrisy should continue. The problem with the Republican party was they they always "played nice". In other words they acted all dignified and responded with "oh dear" when they were getting kicked in the balls. The libs just ran roughshod over the conservatives like a bully taken lunch money from a skinny girl. On the one hand you have people saying conservatives like people named Stephen Miller should tone it down but at the same time jumping on the Steve Bannon wagon agreeing it's time to round 'em up. Maybe the plea is to just shut up then kick ass and take names? From what I've seen most of the social media platforms like X, FB, Twitter, et all are mind wasting sewers and people would be better to spend less time filtering through the nonsense. It's mostly brain rot entertainment. Society as a whole is for the worse because of those kick hit zinger posts that are meant to be "liked" and reposted with so much ease. I'm pretty much way past tired of reading about "social media influencers". Can we get these people a real job that contributes to society rather than brain rots the zombie followers?
Anit-Zionist like the villgecrazylady ("it takes a village") can put out all the Jew hating opinions they want, that does not make it true.Posting in case this gets deleted ..
Mel
@Villgecrazylady
Was Charlie Kirk becoming an anti-Zionist?
No.
Did Charlie Kirk have an Israel problem? Yes.
Let me to explain. Audience capture is real. It happens to everyone: influencers, content creators, independent journalists, entertainers, etc.
And Charlie Kirk’s audience was growing more and more discontented with Israel. He was getting confronted on the regular over Israel’s influence on our government and the constant prioritization of Zionist interests by Republicans in Congress.
And let’s get real: it’s not easy for anyone besides the most diehard Israel-Firsters to defend Israel these days. So getting confronted by young conservative men, over America’s obvious subservience to this foreign regime… the same young men he had empowered to push back against the globalists… couldn’t have been easy.
As time wore on, his frustration with this became evident. He vented about not being able to criticize Israel’s government; he vented about secular Jews supporting so many liberal causes. And probably most problematic of all: he started to give a platform to antizionist voices (albeit, moderate ones).
Does that mean “Israel” offed him? No.
But Charlie Kirk was a good family man, with few vices and an ideological commitment to America First. And he commanded the most organized conservative youth movement on the planet. So if he was starting to view Israel as more of a liability than an asset then he absolutely was a threat to Zionism.
View attachment 227965
For those who don't know Kaliningrad is not in mainland Russia it's doesn't share land border with Russia but it's still Russian region. Nato countries bordering it have made statements many times about cutting off it's road and rail access with some EU politicians even making statements about invading it. These are Russian red lines.
I don't see any mention of this on the Faux News homepage. Its kinda a big thing.
All over Social media for hours. 3 Million people protesting the UK government,
But for those waiting for MSM, it should be on soon, they're still trying to decide what to tell you to think about it
Can you expand on your understanding of what Charlie might have been referring to, and why you are relating this to the Anti-Israel issue?I wonder what he means by "I'm very sympathetic towards the dispensationalist view"?
View attachment 228003
can you expand on your understanding of what Charlie might have been referring to?