US Elections (& Politics) :)

FWIW

But Bondi isn't a loose cannon deciding on her own not to release it? Trump or Susie Wiles advising Trump to not release the info and him being gullible enough to listen to her?
 
So if the Epstein thing was a big to do about nothing then what are they fighting about? Ah ha...busted!!!

1752276042799.png
 
Dear President Trump;

We know Epstein was a TURD!
Well my Dad taught me a long time ago and said,
"Son if you play with a turd, you;ll get shit on yourself"!

I know you bastards in DC play word games, The nonexistence of "Epstein's Client List" might be, as
it relates to "his own personal list" might be semi-true, it does not mean y'all do not have a
list of the rich perverts that are on the reels of sick kiddie porn videos.
Why are you playing with this turd?
 
But Bondi isn't a loose cannon deciding on her own not to release it? Trump or Susie Wiles advising Trump to not release the info and him being gullible enough to listen to her?

Trump is FULLY involved in the decision not to release. Susie likely helped him with that opinion.
Trump is not fully in control. he has people he has to answer to
 
BREAKING:
My 3rd cousin's stepsisters uncle says Trump is holding all the cards and this is all just 14D chess to rat out the Aliens who are holding Dan hostage
 
BREAKING:
My 3rd cousin's stepsisters uncle says Trump is holding all the cards and this is all just 14D chess to rat out the Aliens who are holding Dan hostage
Finally, something believable.
 
Pretty good

 
  • Like
Reactions: VorlonFrog
I saw this post about Epstein on another forum, and it is another point of view.

1. A "client list " means that there was a business arrangement....there is no indication of money changing hands, perhaps you know more?
2. the biden white house would do anything to stop trump............yet nothing
3. the DOJ under Garland would have selectively leaked it...yet nothing
4. the mainstream media would have headlined it, or, even a smell of it, yet nothing
5. the "deep state" would sacrifice some of its own , with the hatred of trump, yet nothing
6. dozens , if not hundreds of eyes have seen those files over the last 6 years, yet nothing
7. It is Washington, for Chris sakes, anyone of which would leak parts of it in a heartbeat, IF, THERE WAS SOMETHING TO LEAK
 
My take

1. A "client list " means that there was a business arrangement....there is no indication of money changing hands, perhaps you know more?
Its a figure of speech. not a ledger list by Epstein. Its two things: 1) A documentation of evidence by FBI taken from records, videos, pictures, witnesses etc and 2) Ghislaine's little black book that is documented and was sealed per court order (public trial transcript) and hasn't been seen since but is in theory in FBI hands

2. the biden white house would do anything to stop trump............yet nothing
Yes but 1) Trump may or may not be in the "list" and 2) once you open pandora's box its wide open. You can;t just pull one name out, without evidence, and say "oh there wasn;t anyone else" No its open and lots of people on YOUR side are fucked

3. the DOJ under Garland would have selectively leaked it...yet nothing
See #2 above. And I highly doubt an imbecile like Garland was allowed to see it. Also remember this is likely much bigger than Trump or Biden or even Obama. It likely implicated directly that Israeli Mossad was running the Op, Epstein worked for them, and CIA was merely "helping", along with MI6. Egyptian Sheiks, Prime ministers, wealthy World Bankers, it may well be enough to cause governments to fall and wars to start.

4. the mainstream media would have headlined it, or, even a smell of it, yet nothing
LOL, the MSM doesnt want it to see the light of day. They're 100% implicated. They're also inept, When was the last time a MSM talking head broke a story? If anything people like Shellenberger, (see post 3 up from here) one of the best, would break it. He across accounts has something like 10X the audience of MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC etc. So the Media is on it, just not the dead-but-dont-quite-know-it-yet TV MSM. Frankly only peo/ple 65-70+ even watch them now. They get most of their scoops from the NEW Media folks.

5. the "deep state" would sacrifice some of its own , with the hatred of trump, yet nothing
Not sure what that means exactly, but actually they are. Comey and Brennan are up to bat just this week. Now I dont expect much to happen, but they're in the public hot seat and DOJ has launched a formal investigation. They're both as Deep State as it gets.

6. dozens , if not hundreds of eyes have seen those files over the last 6 years, yet nothing
Doubtful. Dozens maybe max. Many of the "files" (tapes etc) were collected, deposited in FBI vaults and were'nt even available to Ghislaine for her own trial. No few people have "seen" the actual evidence, that you can be sure, and I agree had there been more we'd have heard about it.

7. It is Washington, for Chris sakes, anyone of which would leak parts of it in a heartbeat, IF, THERE WAS SOMETHING TO LEAK
LOL I get it, but this isnt some memo people can pull up on a terminal at the State Dept and browse with a security clearance. The author is making bad assumptions that the "evidence" was handed around for folks to gawk at. I dont doubt many dozens high up in FBI/CIA KNEW something was going on, I hardly think the Mossad was sloppy enought to leave evidence sitting around to be found. They're the Best in the world. The physical evidence from the Island and houses wasn't even entered into the FBI system, most of it.
Just about 3 weeks ago it was in the headlines that they found this locked secret room at FBI HQ with evidence that was classified (illegally) so high that not even the FBI Director was theoretically allowed to see it. It was hidden and they only found out about the room via a whistleblower, who had NO IDEA Epstein evidence was in there. Will be interesting to know someday what ELSE they found in that room.

If it’s such an easy leak, ask that guy why 60 years later we still don’t have the evidence (documents saying “. We did it” ) on the JFK Assassination? Let alone physical evidence we believe was tampered with and hidden. We know Israel was involved, we know CIA was involved, but there’s still not enough evidence available to prosecute anyone.
We just got confirmation there was 99% chance of at least 2 shooters in the past few months, there are still thousands of pages of the file not yet public. . 60 years later
 
Last edited:
As to Karen Bass wanting to give money to the illegals, I say that she is aiding and abetting this criminal activity.

Clearly
 
 
They’re priming the pump for the NBT - next big thing, to be outraged about.

The Russian Collusion story, the stolen election and the plot to deny Trump of being President.

The problem is:
1- most if this is already public, senate testimony, documents, whistleblowers, etc. it’s not “New””
2- few if any of the players will ever be prosecuted and fewer will go to jail

It will be nice to have some details filled in on the record, but there’s little mystery remaining.

I think this is mostly Look Squirrel >>> because of the points above and a key piece for reelection campaign tv Ads

 
They done f*cked around, they's 'bout to FIND OUT.
Naw, a liberal judge will make a ruling that ICE cannot arrest "free speech" protesters.