The specs are nearly identical for these two PTZs. Does one outperform the other in real world use? I am trying to decide between the two and just want the best performing PTZ at that price point.
SD4A425DB-HNY vs SD49425XB-HNR
- Thread starter Ipcamquest
- Start date
I have them both.
The 49425 has better infrared, so if you are in dark place, the 49425 is the better choice.
But the small form factor of the SD4A is nice and for some that is the driving factor. Plus its tracking is better.
The 49425 has better infrared, so if you are in dark place, the 49425 is the better choice.
But the small form factor of the SD4A is nice and for some that is the driving factor. Plus its tracking is better.
If there was supplemental IR, would you consider the performance equal? Is the firmware functionality the same on both? I appreciate you taking the time to provide feedback. Always great to see comparisons from someone that has both products?
Yeah, if you can provide additional IR, I would put the favor into the mini-PTZ.
The firmware are two different types. The 49425 is the old GUI that if you have Dahua OEM cams in the past, it will be very familiar.
The mini-PTZ uses the new web GUI that not many are a fan of (basically because we are used to the older one LOL). But it has more functionality, including the ability to have many more profiles instead of just day and night profile of the older GUI.
The mini-PTZ has the newest tracking algorithm so it can predict where the object is going to get you past a pesky tree or something a lot easier than the 49425.
I also think being newer, the chipset/sensor on it is probably a little better.
But in a straight shootout of the two in a dark location, after about 50 feet out, the 49425 has the advantage due to better infrared.
The firmware are two different types. The 49425 is the old GUI that if you have Dahua OEM cams in the past, it will be very familiar.
The mini-PTZ uses the new web GUI that not many are a fan of (basically because we are used to the older one LOL). But it has more functionality, including the ability to have many more profiles instead of just day and night profile of the older GUI.
The mini-PTZ has the newest tracking algorithm so it can predict where the object is going to get you past a pesky tree or something a lot easier than the 49425.
I also think being newer, the chipset/sensor on it is probably a little better.
But in a straight shootout of the two in a dark location, after about 50 feet out, the 49425 has the advantage due to better infrared.
looney2ns
IPCT Contributor
I just posted a comparison thread:
ipcamtalk.com
Comparison between PTZs - the 49225 versus 49425 versus Mini-PTZ - mailbox checker
We recently had a group come thru checking mailboxes, so I wanted to share the differences between the PTZs. I purchased these from @EMPIRETECANDY The 49225 was the sub $400 autotracking king of PTZs. It sports 2MP on the 1/2.8" sensor. This camera is still being sold, but autotracking has...
If you want a good one, Andy has the 49225 on his refurb list right now, but it will go quick!
ipcamtalk.com
EmpireTech 8th Anniverasay Sales July.18th-23rd
Hey Guys This year's Summer Sales we will put together with the 8th Anniversary sales, thanks for all guys support here and we can keep moving on. This month we get our official website ready and release www.empiretech01.com, will make support and downloading things easier. The Traditional IR...