- Sep 25, 2017
- 2,875
- 3,758
Tough choices.
Does anyone have several of these to offer comparison opinions?
I've been thinking of getting maybe 1 of each of 4kt and 5442 ZE and have been rewatching Wildcats excellent videos. However, in direct comparisons, it appears at night the 5442 might actually be clearer and that the 4kx on the revisit still shows some shallow depth of field and lack of sharpness close up to the camera (16-8 feet on 3.6mm). At 8 feet in the 250W floodlight test, it still appears blown out with white blankish faces and blanked out tshirt although in fairness 250W is probably a lot of lumens if LED! There's no doubt the overall picture is brighter on the 4kt so offering an advantage when there's not enough light for the 5442 in forced colour, but the 5442 whilst dimmer, also looks clearer and more in focus. So where there enough light, eg a 30w flood, is the 4kt really the best buy out of the two?
I was just wondering what those of you with these cameras thought.
These are the comparisons from Wildcat's video - 5442 is the right, other 2 are 4kt original and revisit:

Of course those of you who can put these side by side in real life, might have different findings again.
Also, on the subject of 5442, how does the 5842 compare? Whilst more pixels usually isn't better, my car port whilst very low in ambient light, does have sensor lighting with 6 x 10w (800 lumen ie 4,800 lumens total) in floodlights mounted in the roofspace at spaced intervals to give the 4800 lumens spread over an area 30 feet by 12 feet approx. The result is a low to medium brightness diffused lighting. So I was wondering if the 4kt is the best option here or would the 5442 or even 5842 be better given the lighting?
Some advice appreciated from those of you with 4kt to 5442 to compare and also 5442 / 4kt to 5882 to compare.
The 2 sites are for under my car port to protect my driveway, back door and vehicle and my back garde, facing back to the house to protect rear entry to the property:
Rear Windows (I can increase light here by adding a larger flood quite easily):

Drive way:

The light levels are approximated as my phone brightens the image so I had to reduce the gamma in a photo editor to try to simulate the available light.
Appreciate thoughts from people with any combinations of more than 1 of these cameras.
Does anyone have several of these to offer comparison opinions?
I've been thinking of getting maybe 1 of each of 4kt and 5442 ZE and have been rewatching Wildcats excellent videos. However, in direct comparisons, it appears at night the 5442 might actually be clearer and that the 4kx on the revisit still shows some shallow depth of field and lack of sharpness close up to the camera (16-8 feet on 3.6mm). At 8 feet in the 250W floodlight test, it still appears blown out with white blankish faces and blanked out tshirt although in fairness 250W is probably a lot of lumens if LED! There's no doubt the overall picture is brighter on the 4kt so offering an advantage when there's not enough light for the 5442 in forced colour, but the 5442 whilst dimmer, also looks clearer and more in focus. So where there enough light, eg a 30w flood, is the 4kt really the best buy out of the two?
I was just wondering what those of you with these cameras thought.
These are the comparisons from Wildcat's video - 5442 is the right, other 2 are 4kt original and revisit:

Of course those of you who can put these side by side in real life, might have different findings again.
Also, on the subject of 5442, how does the 5842 compare? Whilst more pixels usually isn't better, my car port whilst very low in ambient light, does have sensor lighting with 6 x 10w (800 lumen ie 4,800 lumens total) in floodlights mounted in the roofspace at spaced intervals to give the 4800 lumens spread over an area 30 feet by 12 feet approx. The result is a low to medium brightness diffused lighting. So I was wondering if the 4kt is the best option here or would the 5442 or even 5842 be better given the lighting?
Some advice appreciated from those of you with 4kt to 5442 to compare and also 5442 / 4kt to 5882 to compare.
The 2 sites are for under my car port to protect my driveway, back door and vehicle and my back garde, facing back to the house to protect rear entry to the property:
Rear Windows (I can increase light here by adding a larger flood quite easily):

Drive way:

The light levels are approximated as my phone brightens the image so I had to reduce the gamma in a photo editor to try to simulate the available light.
Appreciate thoughts from people with any combinations of more than 1 of these cameras.