
Who's going to keep the vandals away from those solar panels? Maybe when triggered it'll release a hungry, pissed-off pit bull that lives in a drawer that pops out from behind the "ring" logo?
Now your thinking outside the box. Nice! Got me searching and found these lolAny tech reason (electrical/electronic) why the solar panels could not be installed up higher, perhaps above the cameras in order to defy direct vandalism of the panels?
I can see that a ferocious wind can push on them and the taller the mast the more leverage they'd have but just a little would help. The heavy batteries and charge equipment in an secure, armored box at the bottom (as show) PLUS perhaps some anchors could help prevent tipping by the wind.
Could a wind-driven charger be added up there to help with those overcast days that don't recharge the batteries well?
The panels when placed above the cameras could help shelter them from direct rain and sun, perhaps extending their life.

This is about the only thing that sign / camera wise that seems to get destroyed in the UK - the highly unpopular London ULEZ cameras:
Heck, I've got ads but no video of the report on both Chrome and Edge.....I've think they've tried those as well, probably too heavy to run away with and difficult to conceal. Don't forget UK has CCTV everywhere. I guess carrying a bag probably makes them too easily identifiable. I don't know but I imagine they go down streets with no cameras then change appearance. Hard to do with a large bag or saw.
This shows the extremes some have gone to, a guy got arrested and charged by anti-terror police after using a bomb!!! Several video clips inside but consumer cctv.
![]()
Sidcup man convicted aover explosive attack on Ulez camera
Kevin Rees's homemade bomb caused damage to vehicles and property including a child's bedroom.www.bbc.co.uk

